GeForce 920A vs Radeon HD 6650A

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 920A vs Radeon HD 6650A FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 920A vs Radeon HD 6650A: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 920A

2015

Why buy it

✅55.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Draws 33W instead of 45W, a 12W reduction.
✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon HD 6650A

2011

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 920A across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌36.4% higher power demand at 45W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce 920A is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 55.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon HD 6650A instead at 836 vs 829, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 920A is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2015 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 6650A makes the most sense to buy today. It is priced the same on MSRP at $100 vs $100, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 0.8% (8.4 vs 8.3), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 6650A is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce 920A has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce 920A vs Radeon HD 6650A Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 920A

The GeForce 920A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 829 points.

Radeon HD 6650A

The Radeon HD 6650A is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 19 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 836 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 920A scores 829 and the Radeon HD 6650A reaches 836 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 920A is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 6650A uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 920A) vs 480 (Radeon HD 6650A). Raw compute: 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce 920A) vs 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6650A).

Feature	GeForce 920A	Radeon HD 6650A
G3D Mark Score	829	836
Architecture	Maxwell	TeraScale 2
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	384	480+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7227 TFLOPS+25%	0.576 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	8
TMUs	24	24
L1 Cache	192 KB+300%	48 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 920A gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 6650A leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 920A	Radeon HD 6650A
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 920A and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6650A. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 920A) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 6650A) — the GeForce 920A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 920A	Radeon HD 6650A
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 920A draws 33W versus the Radeon HD 6650A's 45W — a 30.8% difference. The GeForce 920A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 920A) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6650A). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	GeForce 920A	Radeon HD 6650A
TDP	33W-27%	45W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	1x 6-pin
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	25.1+35%	18.6

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 920A came in at $100, while the Radeon HD 6650A launched at $100. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 8.3 (GeForce 920A) vs 8.4 (Radeon HD 6650A) — the Radeon HD 6650A offers 1.2% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 920A (2015 vs 2011).

Feature	GeForce 920A	Radeon HD 6650A
MSRP	$100	$100
Performance per Dollar	8.3	8.4+1%
Codename	GM108	Onega
Release	March 13 2015	April 19 2011
Ranking	#810	#926

Search GeForce 920A on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 6650A on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.