GeForce 920A vs Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600

NVIDIA

GeForce 920A

2015Core: 928 MHzBoost: 941 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600

2023Core: 1855 MHzBoost: 2495 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce 920A vs Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 920A vs Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 920A vs Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 920A

2015

Why buy it

  • Costs $19 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $119 MSRP).
  • Delivers 17.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.3 vs 7.0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $119 MSRP).
  • Draws 33W instead of 295W, a 262W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600

2023

Why buy it

  • 44.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 19% HIGHER MSRP
    $119 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.0 vs 8.3 G3D/$ ($119 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • 793.9% higher power demand at 295W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 44.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1% in PassMark G3D (837 vs 829), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 5nm process instead of 28nm, 96 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2015. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 920A makes the most sense to buy today. It is $19 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $119, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 17.9% (8.3 vs 7.0), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce 920A is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce 920A vs Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 920A

The GeForce 920A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 829 points.

AMD

Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600

The Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1855 MHz to 2495 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 96 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 837 points. Launch price was $3,999.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 920A scores 829 and the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 reaches 837 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 920A is built on Maxwell while the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 920A) vs 6,144 (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600). Raw compute: 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce 920A) vs 61.32 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600). Boost clocks: 941 MHz vs 2495 MHz.

FeatureGeForce 920ARadeon R7 PRO A8-9600
G3D Mark Score
829
837
Architecture
Maxwell
RDNA 3.0
Process Node
28 nm
5 nm
Shading Units
384
6144+1500%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7227 TFLOPS
61.32 TFLOPS+8385%
Boost Clock
941 MHz
2495 MHz+165%
ROPs
8
192+2300%
TMUs
24
384+1500%
L1 Cache
0.19 MB
3 MB+1479%
L2 Cache
1 MB
6 MB+500%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 920A gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce 920ARadeon R7 PRO A8-9600
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 920A and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 920A) vs 6 MB (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600) — the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 920ARadeon R7 PRO A8-9600
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
6 MB+500%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 920A draws 33W versus the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600's 295W — a 159.8% difference. The GeForce 920A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 920A) vs 350W (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce 920ARadeon R7 PRO A8-9600
TDP
33W-89%
295W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
70°C
Perf/Watt
25.1+796%
2.8
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 920A came in at $100, while the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 launched at $119. On MSRP, GeForce 920A was 16% cheaper ($19 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 8.3 (GeForce 920A) vs 7.0 (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600) — the GeForce 920A offers 18.6% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 (2023 vs 2015).

FeatureGeForce 920ARadeon R7 PRO A8-9600
MSRP
$100-16%
$119
Performance per Dollar
8.3+19%
7.0
Codename
GM108
Navi 31
Release
March 13 2015
April 13 2023
Ranking
#810
#26

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.