GeForce 920A vs Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600
GeForce 920A
Popular choices:
Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 920A is positioned at rank 396 and the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 is on rank 173, so the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 920A
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 is significantly newer (2023 vs 2015). The Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 920A lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 920A.
| Insight | GeForce 920A | Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) (5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 920A offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $15 versus $86 for the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600, it costs 83% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 467.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 920A | Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+467.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($86) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 920A and Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600
GeForce 920A
The GeForce 920A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 829 points.
Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600
The Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1855 MHz to 2495 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 96 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 837 points. Launch price was $3,999.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 920A scores 829 and the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 reaches 837 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 920A is built on Maxwell while the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 920A) vs 6,144 (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600). Raw compute: 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce 920A) vs 61.32 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600). Boost clocks: 941 MHz vs 2495 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 920A | Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 829 | 837 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 6144+1500% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7227 TFLOPS | 61.32 TFLOPS+8385% |
| Boost Clock | 941 MHz | 2495 MHz+165% |
| ROPs | 8 | 192+2300% |
| TMUs | 24 | 384+1500% |
| L1 Cache | 0.19 MB | 3 MB+1479% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 6 MB+500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 920A | Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 920A) vs 6 MB (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600) — the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 920A | Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 6 MB+500% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 920A draws 33W versus the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600's 295W — a 159.8% difference. The GeForce 920A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 920A) vs 350W (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce 920A | Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-89% | 295W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 25.1+796% | 2.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 920A launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 launched at $119 and now averages $86. The GeForce 920A costs 82.6% less ($71 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 55.3 (GeForce 920A) vs 9.7 (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600) — the GeForce 920A offers 470.1% better value. The Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce 920A | Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-16% | $119 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-83% | $86 |
| Performance per Dollar | 55.3+470% | 9.7 |
| Codename | GM108 | Navi 31 |
| Release | March 13 2015 | April 13 2023 |
| Ranking | #810 | #26 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 920A and Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600
