
GeForce 920A

Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600
GeForce 920A vs Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 920A vs Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 920A vs Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 920A
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $19 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $119 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 17.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.3 vs 7.0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $119 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 33W instead of 295W, a 262W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600
2023Why buy it
- ✅44.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌19% HIGHER MSRP$119 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.0 vs 8.3 G3D/$ ($119 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ❌793.9% higher power demand at 295W vs 33W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 920A vs Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 920A
The GeForce 920A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 829 points.

Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600
The Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1855 MHz to 2495 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 96 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 837 points. Launch price was $3,999.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 920A scores 829 and the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 reaches 837 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 920A is built on Maxwell while the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 920A) vs 6,144 (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600). Raw compute: 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce 920A) vs 61.32 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600). Boost clocks: 941 MHz vs 2495 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 920A | Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 829 | 837 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 6144+1500% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7227 TFLOPS | 61.32 TFLOPS+8385% |
| Boost Clock | 941 MHz | 2495 MHz+165% |
| ROPs | 8 | 192+2300% |
| TMUs | 24 | 384+1500% |
| L1 Cache | 0.19 MB | 3 MB+1479% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 6 MB+500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 920A gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 920A | Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 920A and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 920A) vs 6 MB (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600) — the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 920A | Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 6 MB+500% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 920A draws 33W versus the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600's 295W — a 159.8% difference. The GeForce 920A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 920A) vs 350W (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce 920A | Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-89% | 295W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 25.1+796% | 2.8 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 920A came in at $100, while the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 launched at $119. On MSRP, GeForce 920A was 16% cheaper ($19 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 8.3 (GeForce 920A) vs 7.0 (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600) — the GeForce 920A offers 18.6% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 (2023 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce 920A | Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-16% | $119 |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.3+19% | 7.0 |
| Codename | GM108 | Navi 31 |
| Release | March 13 2015 | April 13 2023 |
| Ranking | #810 | #26 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














