
Quadro FX 3800

Radeon HD 3850 X2
Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon HD 3850 X2 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon HD 3850 X2 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon HD 3850 X2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro FX 3800
2008Why buy it
- ✅Draws 189W instead of 254W, a 65W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 267mm, a 266mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 3850 X2 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌128.9% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.0 vs 2.4 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
Radeon HD 3850 X2
2011Why buy it
- ✅0.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $450 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 128.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.4 vs 1.0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌34.4% higher power demand at 254W vs 189W.
- ❌26600% longer card at 267mm vs 1mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon HD 3850 X2 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 3800
The Quadro FX 3800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 824 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Radeon HD 3850 X2
The Radeon HD 3850 X2 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 19 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 960 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 254W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 822 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro FX 3800 scores 824 and the Radeon HD 3850 X2 reaches 822 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 3800 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon HD 3850 X2 uses TeraScale 2, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 3800) vs 960 (Radeon HD 3850 X2). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3800) vs 1.536 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 3850 X2).
| Feature | Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon HD 3850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 824 | 822 |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 240 | 960 ×2+300% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6221 TFLOPS | 1.536 TFLOPS ×2+147% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 ×2 |
| TMUs | 80+67% | 48 ×2 |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon HD 3850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 1 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 3800 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 3850 X2. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro FX 3800) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 3850 X2) — the Radeon HD 3850 X2 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon HD 3850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10_0 (Quadro FX 3800) vs 10.1 (Radeon HD 3850 X2). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon HD 3850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10_0 | 10.1 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Decoder: PureVideo HD vs UVD+.
| Feature | Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon HD 3850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD | — |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD | UVD+ |
| Codecs | — | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 3800 draws 189W versus the Radeon HD 3850 X2's 254W — a 29.3% difference. The Quadro FX 3800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 3800) vs 450W (Radeon HD 3850 X2). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 1mm vs 267mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon HD 3850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 189W-26% | 254W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 1mm | 267mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 90°C |
| Perf/Watt | 4.4+38% | 3.2 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro FX 3800 came in at $799, while the Radeon HD 3850 X2 launched at $349. On MSRP, Radeon HD 3850 X2 was 56.3% cheaper ($450 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.0 (Quadro FX 3800) vs 2.4 (Radeon HD 3850 X2) — the Radeon HD 3850 X2 offers 140% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 3850 X2 (2011 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon HD 3850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | $349-56% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.0 | 2.4+140% |
| Codename | GT200B | Barts |
| Release | November 11 2008 | September 19 2011 |
| Ranking | #815 | #630 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















