
Quadro FX 3800

Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual
Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro FX 3800
2008Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌432.7% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.0 vs 5.5 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ❌278% higher power demand at 189W vs 50W.
Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual
2013Why buy it
- ✅17.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $649 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 437.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.5 vs 1.0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 189W, a 139W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 3800
The Quadro FX 3800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 824 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual
The Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 1 2013. The core clock speed is 720 / 775 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 832 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro FX 3800 scores 824 and the Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual reaches 832 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 3800) vs 768 (Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual).
| Feature | Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 824 | 832 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 240 | 768+220% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro FX 3800 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual carries 512 MB. Quadro FX 3800 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 3800 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual.
| Feature | Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10_0 (Quadro FX 3800) vs 11.2 (FL 11_0) (Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10_0 | 11.2 (FL 11_0)+12% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD (Quadro FX 3800) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual). Decoder: PureVideo HD vs UVD 3.0.
| Feature | Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD | UVD 3.0 |
| Codecs | — | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 3800 draws 189W versus the Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual's 50W — a 116.3% difference. The Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 3800) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 189W | 50W-74% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Perf/Watt | 4.4 | 16.6+277% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro FX 3800 came in at $799, while the Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual launched at $150. On MSRP, Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual was 81.2% cheaper ($649 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.0 (Quadro FX 3800) vs 5.5 (Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual) — the Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual offers 450% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual (2013 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | $150-81% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.0 | 5.5+450% |
| Codename | GT200B | — |
| Release | November 11 2008 | August 1 2013 |
| Ranking | #815 | #881 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















