Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon R7 A8-7670K

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 3800

2008Core: 610 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 A8-7670K

2015Boost: 975 MHz

Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon R7 A8-7670K Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon R7 A8-7670K FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon R7 A8-7670K: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 3800

2008

Why buy it

  • βœ…100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 A8-7670K across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • ❌2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌
    577.1% HIGHER MSRP
    $799 MSRPvs$118 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.0 vs 7.2 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $118 MSRP).
  • ❌89% higher power demand at 189W vs 100W.

Radeon R7 A8-7670K

2015

Why buy it

  • βœ…19.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • βœ…Costs $681 less on MSRP ($118 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
  • βœ…Delivers 596% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.2 vs 1.0 G3D/$ ($118 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
  • βœ…Draws 100W instead of 189W, a 89W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R7 A8-7670K is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 19.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.8% in PassMark G3D (847 vs 824), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro FX 3800 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R7 A8-7670K makes the most sense to buy today. It is $681 cheaper on MSRP at $118 vs $799, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 596% (7.2 vs 1.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 A8-7670K is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro FX 3800 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon R7 A8-7670K Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 3800

The Quadro FX 3800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 824 points. Launch price was $3,499.

AMD

Radeon R7 A8-7670K

The Radeon R7 A8-7670K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 847 points. Launch price was $149.

⚑

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 3800 scores 824 and the Radeon R7 A8-7670K reaches 847 in the G3D Mark benchmark β€” just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 3800 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon R7 A8-7670K uses GCN 1.0, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 3800) vs 1,024 (Radeon R7 A8-7670K). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3800) vs 1.997 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A8-7670K).

FeatureQuadro FX 3800Radeon R7 A8-7670K
G3D Mark Score
824
847+3%
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
55 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
240
1024+327%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6221 TFLOPS
1.997 TFLOPS+221%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
80+25%
64
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro FX 3800Radeon R7 A8-7670K
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
πŸ’Ύ

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 3800 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 A8-7670K carries 512 MB. Quadro FX 3800 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 3800 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 A8-7670K. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro FX 3800) vs 512 KB (Radeon R7 A8-7670K) β€” the Radeon R7 A8-7670K has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro FX 3800Radeon R7 A8-7670K
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
πŸ–₯️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10_0 (Quadro FX 3800) vs 12 (Radeon R7 A8-7670K). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.

FeatureQuadro FX 3800Radeon R7 A8-7670K
DirectX
10_0
12+20%
Max Displays
2
4+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD (Quadro FX 3800) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R7 A8-7670K). Decoder: PureVideo HD vs UVD 4.0.

FeatureQuadro FX 3800Radeon R7 A8-7670K
Encoder
PureVideo HD
VCE 1.0
Decoder
PureVideo HD
UVD 4.0
Codecs
β€”
H.264,HEVC (Partial),MPEG-4
πŸ”Œ

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 3800 draws 189W versus the Radeon R7 A8-7670K's 100W β€” a 61.6% difference. The Radeon R7 A8-7670K is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 3800) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A8-7670K). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

FeatureQuadro FX 3800Radeon R7 A8-7670K
TDP
189W
100W-47%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
1mm
β€”
Slots
1
β€”
Temp (Load)
β€”
65Β°C
Perf/Watt
4.4
8.5+93%
πŸ’°

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro FX 3800 came in at $799, while the Radeon R7 A8-7670K launched at $118. On MSRP, Radeon R7 A8-7670K was 85.2% cheaper ($681 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.0 (Quadro FX 3800) vs 7.2 (Radeon R7 A8-7670K) β€” the Radeon R7 A8-7670K offers 620% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 A8-7670K (2015 vs 2008).

FeatureQuadro FX 3800Radeon R7 A8-7670K
MSRP
$799
$118-85%
Performance per Dollar
1.0
7.2+620%
Codename
GT200B
Trinidad
Release
November 11 2008
June 18 2015
Ranking
#815
#467

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.