Quadro FX 3800
VS
Radeon HD 6650A

Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon HD 6650A

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 3800

2008Core: 610 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 6650A

2011Core: 600 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 3800 is positioned at rank 347 and the Radeon HD 6650A is on rank 395, so the Quadro FX 3800 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 3800

#331
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
14343%
#346
FirePro V8700
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $170
100%
#347
Quadro FX 3800
MSRP: $799|Avg: $20
100%
#349
GRID K520
MSRP: $3599|Avg: $50
95%
#350
GRID P40-12Q
MSRP: $5699|Avg: $5699
94%
#351
FirePro 2270
MSRP: $149|Avg: $30
92%
#352
FirePro 2460
MSRP: $180|Avg: $10
91%
#354
FirePro 3D V5700
MSRP: $599|Avg: $25
88%
#355
Quadro FX 580
MSRP: $199|Avg: $500
88%
#356
GRID M60-1B
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120
87%
#358
FireStream 9270
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $20
86%
#359
Quadro 400
MSRP: $169|Avg: $500
85%
#360
FirePro 2260
MSRP: $129|Avg: $15
85%
#361
Quadro FX 380 LP
MSRP: $169|Avg: $15
83%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6650A

#385
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
1299%
#387
1177%
#388
1174%
#392
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
1068%
#393
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
1060%
#395
Radeon HD 6650A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
100%
#396
GeForce 920A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
99%
#397
GeForce 930A
MSRP: $150|Avg: $20
99%
#398
Mobility Radeon HD 4650
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
98%
#399
Radeon R9 M290X
MSRP: $400|Avg: $60
96%
#401
Radeon HD 7670
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
96%
#402
Radeon HD 8550G + 8750M Dual
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
95%
#403
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
93%
#404
Mobility Radeon HD 5000
MSRP: $99|Avg: $20
93%
#406
93%
#407
Radeon HD 8650G + 7700M Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
90%
#408
Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
MSRP: $800|Avg: $200
90%
#409
GeForce GTX 285M SLI
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40
88%
#410
Radeon R7 M260X
MSRP: $139|Avg: $35
87%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon HD 6650A is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro FX 3800 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightQuadro FX 3800Radeon HD 6650A
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%)
Leading raw performance (+1.5%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Quadro FX 3800 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro FX 3800 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $50), it costs 60% less, resulting in a 146.4% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightQuadro FX 3800Radeon HD 6650A
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+146.4%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($20)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 3800 and Radeon HD 6650A

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 3800

The Quadro FX 3800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 824 points. Launch price was $3,499.

AMD

Radeon HD 6650A

The Radeon HD 6650A is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 19 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 836 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 3800 scores 824 and the Radeon HD 6650A reaches 836 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 3800 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon HD 6650A uses TeraScale 2, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 3800) vs 480 (Radeon HD 6650A). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3800) vs 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6650A).

FeatureQuadro FX 3800Radeon HD 6650A
G3D Mark Score
824
836+1%
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TeraScale 2
Process Node
55 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
240
480+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6221 TFLOPS+8%
0.576 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+300%
8
TMUs
80+233%
24
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro FX 3800Radeon HD 6650A
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 3800 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6650A has 512 MB. The Quadro FX 3800 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureQuadro FX 3800Radeon HD 6650A
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 3800 draws 189W versus the Radeon HD 6650A's 45W — a 123.1% difference. The Radeon HD 6650A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 3800) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6650A). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureQuadro FX 3800Radeon HD 6650A
TDP
189W
45W-76%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
1mm
Slots
1
Perf/Watt
4.4
18.6+323%
💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro FX 3800 launched at $799 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the Radeon HD 6650A launched at $100 and now averages $50. The Quadro FX 3800 costs 60% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 41.2 (Quadro FX 3800) vs 16.7 (Radeon HD 6650A) — the Quadro FX 3800 offers 146.7% better value. The Radeon HD 6650A is the newer GPU (2011 vs 2008).

FeatureQuadro FX 3800Radeon HD 6650A
MSRP
$799
$100-87%
Avg Price (30d)
$20-60%
$50
Performance per Dollar
41.2+147%
16.7
Codename
GT200B
Onega
Release
November 11 2008
April 19 2011
Ranking
#815
#926