
Quadro FX 3800

Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600
Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro FX 3800
2008Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Draws 189W instead of 295W, a 106W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌571.4% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$119 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.0 vs 7.0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $119 MSRP).
Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600
2023Why buy it
- ✅30.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $680 less on MSRP ($119 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 582% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.0 vs 1.0 G3D/$ ($119 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌56.1% higher power demand at 295W vs 189W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 3800
The Quadro FX 3800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 824 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600
The Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1855 MHz to 2495 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 96 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 837 points. Launch price was $3,999.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro FX 3800 scores 824 and the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 reaches 837 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 3800 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 55 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 3800) vs 6,144 (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3800) vs 61.32 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600).
| Feature | Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 824 | 837+2% |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 240 | 6144+2460% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6221 TFLOPS | 61.32 TFLOPS+9757% |
| ROPs | 32 | 192+500% |
| TMUs | 80 | 384+380% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 6 MB+2300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro FX 3800 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 carries 512 MB. Quadro FX 3800 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 3800 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 3800) vs 6 MB (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600) — the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 6 MB+2300% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 3800 draws 189W versus the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600's 295W — a 43.8% difference. The Quadro FX 3800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 3800) vs 350W (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 189W-36% | 295W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 4.4+57% | 2.8 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro FX 3800 came in at $799, while the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 launched at $119. On MSRP, Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 was 85.1% cheaper ($680 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.0 (Quadro FX 3800) vs 7.0 (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600) — the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 offers 600% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 (2023 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | $119-85% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.0 | 7.0+600% |
| Codename | GT200B | Navi 31 |
| Release | November 11 2008 | April 13 2023 |
| Ranking | #815 | #26 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















