Quadro FX 3800
Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U
Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro FX 3800
2008Why buy it
- ✅11.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro FX 3800 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌1160% higher power demand at 189W vs 15W.
Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 189W, a 174W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Vega (2017−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 3800 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Quadro FX 3800
The Quadro FX 3800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 824 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U
The Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 26 2017. It features the Vega architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 832 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro FX 3800 scores 824 and the Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U reaches 832 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 3800 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U uses Vega, both on 55 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 3800) vs 512 (Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3800) vs 1.843 TFLOPS (Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U).
| Feature | Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 824 | 832 |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Vega |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 240 | 512+113% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6221 TFLOPS | 1.843 TFLOPS+196% |
| ROPs | 32+300% | 8 |
| TMUs | 80+150% | 32 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro FX 3800 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U carries 0 MB. Quadro FX 3800 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 3800 and System on the Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U.
| Feature | Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10_0 (Quadro FX 3800) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.
| Feature | Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10_0 | 12 (12_1)+20% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 3+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD (Quadro FX 3800) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U). Decoder: PureVideo HD vs UVD 7.0.
| Feature | Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | — | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 3800 draws 189W versus the Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U's 15W — a 170.6% difference. The Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 3800) vs 1W (Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 1mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 189W | 15W-92% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 1mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 4.4 | 55.5+1161% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro FX 3800 came in at $799, while the Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U was 100+% cheaper ($799 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.0 (Quadro FX 3800) vs Infinity (Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U) — the Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U (2017 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.0 | Infinity |
| Codename | GT200B | Vega Raven Ridge |
| Release | November 11 2008 | October 26 2017 |
| Ranking | #815 | #721 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro FX 3800 and Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U
