
Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U

Quadro FX 3800
Popular choices:

Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro FX 3800 is positioned at rank #347 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 3800
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U is significantly newer (2017 vs 2008). The Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 3800 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro FX 3800 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Vega (2017−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 3800 and Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U

Quadro FX 3800
The Quadro FX 3800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 824 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U
The Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 26 2017. It features the Vega architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 832 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro FX 3800 scores 824 and the Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U reaches 832 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 3800 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U uses Vega, both on 55 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 3800) vs 512 (Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3800) vs 1.843 TFLOPS (Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U).
| Feature | Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 824 | 832 |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Vega |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 240 | 512+113% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6221 TFLOPS | 1.843 TFLOPS+196% |
| ROPs | 32+300% | 8 |
| TMUs | 80+150% | 32 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro FX 3800 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U has 0 MB. The Quadro FX 3800 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10_0 (Quadro FX 3800) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.
| Feature | Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10_0 | 12 (12_1)+20% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 3+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD (Quadro FX 3800) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U). Decoder: PureVideo HD vs UVD 7.0.
| Feature | Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | — | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 3800 draws 189W versus the Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U's 15W — a 170.6% difference. The Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 3800) vs 1W (Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 1mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 189W | 15W-92% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 1mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 4.4 | 55.5+1161% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro FX 3800 launched at $799 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U costs 100+% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 41.2 (Quadro FX 3800) vs Infinity (Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U) — the Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 41.2 | Infinity |
| Codename | GT200B | Vega Raven Ridge |
| Release | November 11 2008 | October 26 2017 |
| Ranking | #815 | #721 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.


















