Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon HD 7690M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon HD 7690M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon HD 7690M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 3800

2008

Why buy it

✅67.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌845% higher power demand at 189W vs 20W.

Radeon HD 7690M

2011

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
✅Draws 20W instead of 189W, a 169W reduction.
✅More future proof: TeraScale 2 (2009−2015) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 3800 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro FX 3800 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 67.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon HD 7690M instead at 832 vs 824, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro FX 3800 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro FX 3800 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon HD 7690M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 3800

The Quadro FX 3800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 824 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Radeon HD 7690M

The Radeon HD 7690M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 25 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 725 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 20W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 832 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 3800 scores 824 and the Radeon HD 7690M reaches 832 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 3800 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon HD 7690M uses TeraScale 2, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 3800) vs 480 (Radeon HD 7690M). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3800) vs 0.696 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7690M).

Feature	Quadro FX 3800	Radeon HD 7690M
G3D Mark Score	824	832
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	TeraScale 2
Process Node	55 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	240	480+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6221 TFLOPS	0.696 TFLOPS+12%
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	80+233%	24
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 3800	Radeon HD 7690M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 3800 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7690M carries 2 GB. Radeon HD 7690M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 3800 and System on the Radeon HD 7690M.

Feature	Quadro FX 3800	Radeon HD 7690M
VRAM Capacity	1 GB	2 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Bus Width	64-bit	System
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 3800 draws 189W versus the Radeon HD 7690M's 20W — a 161.7% difference. The Radeon HD 7690M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 3800) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7690M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	Quadro FX 3800	Radeon HD 7690M
TDP	189W	20W-89%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	1mm	—
Slots	1	—
Perf/Watt	4.4	41.6+845%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon HD 7690M (2011 vs 2008).

Feature	Quadro FX 3800	Radeon HD 7690M
MSRP	$799	—
Codename	GT200B	Thames
Release	November 11 2008	December 25 2011
Ranking	#815	#928

Search Quadro FX 3800 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 7690M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.