Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon E6760

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 3800

2008Core: 610 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon E6760

2011Core: 600 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon E6760 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon E6760 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon E6760: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 3800

2008

Why buy it

  • 24.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • 2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 232.9% HIGHER MSRP
    $799 MSRPvs$240 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.0 vs 3.5 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $240 MSRP).
  • 320% higher power demand at 189W vs 45W.

Radeon E6760

2011

Why buy it

  • Costs $559 less on MSRP ($240 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
  • Delivers 243.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.5 vs 1.0 G3D/$ ($240 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
  • Draws 45W instead of 189W, a 144W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 3800 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro FX 3800 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 24.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon E6760 instead at 850 vs 824, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro FX 3800 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon E6760 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $559 cheaper on MSRP at $240 vs $799, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 243.4% (3.5 vs 1.0), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon E6760 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro FX 3800 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon E6760 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 3800

The Quadro FX 3800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 824 points. Launch price was $3,499.

AMD

Radeon E6760

The Radeon E6760 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 2 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 850 points. Launch price was $239.99.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 3800 scores 824 and the Radeon E6760 reaches 850 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 3800 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon E6760 uses TeraScale 2, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 3800) vs 480 (Radeon E6760).

FeatureQuadro FX 3800Radeon E6760
G3D Mark Score
824
850+3%
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TeraScale 2
Process Node
55 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
240
480+100%
ROPs
32+300%
8
TMUs
80+233%
24

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro FX 3800Radeon E6760
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 3800 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon E6760 carries 512 MB. Quadro FX 3800 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 3800 and 64-bit on the Radeon E6760.

FeatureQuadro FX 3800Radeon E6760
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 3800 draws 189W versus the Radeon E6760's 45W — a 123.1% difference. The Radeon E6760 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 3800) vs 300W (Radeon E6760). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

FeatureQuadro FX 3800Radeon E6760
TDP
189W
45W-76%
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
1mm
Slots
1
Perf/Watt
4.4
18.9+330%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro FX 3800 came in at $799, while the Radeon E6760 launched at $240. On MSRP, Radeon E6760 was 70% cheaper ($559 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.0 (Quadro FX 3800) vs 3.5 (Radeon E6760) — the Radeon E6760 offers 250% better value. The newer card here is Radeon E6760 (2011 vs 2008).

FeatureQuadro FX 3800Radeon E6760
MSRP
$799
$240-70%
Performance per Dollar
1.0
3.5+250%
Codename
GT200B
Turks
Release
November 11 2008
May 2 2011
Ranking
#815
#923

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.