
Quadro FX 3800

Radeon E6760
Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon E6760 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon E6760 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon E6760: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro FX 3800
2008Why buy it
- ✅24.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌232.9% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$240 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.0 vs 3.5 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $240 MSRP).
- ❌320% higher power demand at 189W vs 45W.
Radeon E6760
2011Why buy it
- ✅Costs $559 less on MSRP ($240 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 243.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.5 vs 1.0 G3D/$ ($240 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 189W, a 144W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 3800 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon E6760 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 3800
The Quadro FX 3800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 824 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Radeon E6760
The Radeon E6760 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 2 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 850 points. Launch price was $239.99.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro FX 3800 scores 824 and the Radeon E6760 reaches 850 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 3800 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon E6760 uses TeraScale 2, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 3800) vs 480 (Radeon E6760).
| Feature | Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon E6760 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 824 | 850+3% |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 240 | 480+100% |
| ROPs | 32+300% | 8 |
| TMUs | 80+233% | 24 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon E6760 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro FX 3800 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon E6760 carries 512 MB. Quadro FX 3800 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 3800 and 64-bit on the Radeon E6760.
| Feature | Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon E6760 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 3800 draws 189W versus the Radeon E6760's 45W — a 123.1% difference. The Radeon E6760 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 3800) vs 300W (Radeon E6760). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon E6760 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 189W | 45W-76% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 4.4 | 18.9+330% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro FX 3800 came in at $799, while the Radeon E6760 launched at $240. On MSRP, Radeon E6760 was 70% cheaper ($559 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.0 (Quadro FX 3800) vs 3.5 (Radeon E6760) — the Radeon E6760 offers 250% better value. The newer card here is Radeon E6760 (2011 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon E6760 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | $240-70% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.0 | 3.5+250% |
| Codename | GT200B | Turks |
| Release | November 11 2008 | May 2 2011 |
| Ranking | #815 | #923 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















