CPU
GPU
Radeon HD 4200
Popular choices:
GeForce 8300 GS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 4200 is positioned at rank 308 and the GeForce 8300 GS is on rank 625, so the Radeon HD 4200 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 4200
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 8300 GS
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 8300 GS is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 4200.
| Insight | Radeon HD 4200 | GeForce 8300 GS |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 4200 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 4200 holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $50), it costs 80% less, resulting in a 387% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 4200 | GeForce 8300 GS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+387%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($10) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Path of Exile 2
League of Legends
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 4200 and GeForce 8300 GS
Radeon HD 4200
The Radeon HD 4200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 2 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 112 points. Launch price was $249.
GeForce 8300 GS
The GeForce 8300 GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 115 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 4200 scores 112 and the GeForce 8300 GS reaches 115 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 4200 is built on TeraScale while the GeForce 8300 GS uses Maxwell, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (Radeon HD 4200) vs 256 (GeForce 8300 GS). Raw compute: 1.36 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4200) vs 0.5888 TFLOPS (GeForce 8300 GS).
| Feature | Radeon HD 4200 | GeForce 8300 GS |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 112 | 115+3% |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+213% | 256 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.36 TFLOPS+131% | 0.5888 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 40+150% | 16 |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB+25% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 4200 | GeForce 8300 GS |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 4200) vs 1 MB (GeForce 8300 GS) — the GeForce 8300 GS has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 4200 | GeForce 8300 GS |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (Radeon HD 4200) vs 10.0 (GeForce 8300 GS). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon HD 4200 | GeForce 8300 GS |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD 2 (Radeon HD 4200) vs No (GeForce 8300 GS). Decoder: UVD 2 vs PureVideo HD VP2.
| Feature | Radeon HD 4200 | GeForce 8300 GS |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD 2 | No |
| Decoder | UVD 2 | PureVideo HD VP2 |
| Codecs | — | MPEG-2,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 4200 draws 190W versus the GeForce 8300 GS's 33W — a 140.8% difference. The GeForce 8300 GS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 4200) vs 350W (GeForce 8300 GS). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Legacy. Card length: 1mm vs 170mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | Radeon HD 4200 | GeForce 8300 GS |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 190W | 33W-83% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | Legacy |
| Length | 1mm | 170mm |
| Height | — | 106mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 65°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.6 | 3.5+483% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 4200 launched at $50 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the GeForce 8300 GS launched at $50 and now averages $50. The Radeon HD 4200 costs 80% less ($40 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 11.2 (Radeon HD 4200) vs 2.3 (GeForce 8300 GS) — the Radeon HD 4200 offers 387% better value. The GeForce 8300 GS is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2009).
| Feature | Radeon HD 4200 | GeForce 8300 GS |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50 | $50 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10-80% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.2+387% | 2.3 |
| Codename | RV790 | GM108 |
| Release | April 2 2009 | July 22 2014 |
| Ranking | #762 | #832 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 4200 and GeForce 8300 GS
