CPU
GPU
Radeon HD 4200
Popular choices:
GeForce Go 6800
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 4200 is positioned at rank 308 and the GeForce Go 6800 is on rank 277, so the GeForce Go 6800 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 4200
Performance Per Dollar GeForce Go 6800
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 4200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5.7% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (512 MB vs 128 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce Go 6800.
| Insight | Radeon HD 4200 | GeForce Go 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+5.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-5.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon HD 4200 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 4200 and GeForce Go 6800
Radeon HD 4200
The Radeon HD 4200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 2 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 112 points. Launch price was $249.
GeForce Go 6800
The GeForce Go 6800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 1006 MHz to 1058 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 195W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 106 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon HD 4200 scores 112 versus the GeForce Go 6800's 106 — the Radeon HD 4200 leads by 5.7%. The Radeon HD 4200 is built on TeraScale while the GeForce Go 6800 uses Kepler, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (Radeon HD 4200) vs 1,536 (GeForce Go 6800). Raw compute: 1.36 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4200) vs 3.25 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 6800).
| Feature | Radeon HD 4200 | GeForce Go 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 112+6% | 106 |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Kepler |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 800 | 1536+92% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.36 TFLOPS | 3.25 TFLOPS+139% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 40 | 128+220% |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB+25% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 4200 | GeForce Go 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 4200 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce Go 6800 has 128 MB. The Radeon HD 4200 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon HD 4200) vs 512 KB (GeForce Go 6800) — the GeForce Go 6800 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 4200 | GeForce Go 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+300% | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (Radeon HD 4200) vs 10.0 (GeForce Go 6800). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.
| Feature | Radeon HD 4200 | GeForce Go 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
| Max Displays | 2+100% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD 2 (Radeon HD 4200) vs No (GeForce Go 6800). Decoder: UVD 2 vs PureVideo HD VP2.
| Feature | Radeon HD 4200 | GeForce Go 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD 2 | No |
| Decoder | UVD 2 | PureVideo HD VP2 |
| Codecs | — | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 4200 draws 190W versus the GeForce Go 6800's 195W — a 2.6% difference. The Radeon HD 4200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 4200) vs 350W (GeForce Go 6800). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Legacy. Card length: 1mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Radeon HD 4200 | GeForce Go 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 190W-3% | 195W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | Legacy |
| Length | 1mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.6+20% | 0.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce Go 6800 is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2009).
| Feature | Radeon HD 4200 | GeForce Go 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10 | — |
| Codename | RV790 | GK104 |
| Release | April 2 2009 | March 22 2012 |
| Ranking | #762 | #410 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 4200 and GeForce Go 6800
