Radeon HD 4550 vs Radeon HD 8240

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 4550 vs Radeon HD 8240 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 4550 vs Radeon HD 8240: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 4550

2009

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 151W instead of 200W, a 49W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 8240 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2009 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
18% HIGHER MSRP
$59 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.0 vs 4.9 G3D/$ ($59 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).

Radeon HD 8240

2012

Why buy it

✅21.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $9 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $59 MSRP).
✅Delivers 23% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.9 vs 4.0 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $59 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌32.5% higher power demand at 200W vs 151W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 8240 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 21.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 4.2% in PassMark G3D (246 vs 236), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon HD 4550 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 8240 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $9 cheaper on MSRP at $50 vs $59, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 23% (4.9 vs 4.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 8240 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon HD 4550 has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon HD 4550 vs Radeon HD 8240 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon HD 4550

The Radeon HD 4550 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 30 2009. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1440 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 151W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 236 points. Launch price was $299.

Radeon HD 8240

The Radeon HD 8240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 5 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 246 points. Launch price was $349.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 4550 scores 236 and the Radeon HD 8240 reaches 246 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 4550 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon HD 8240 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,440 (Radeon HD 4550) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 8240). Raw compute: 2.088 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4550) vs 2.56 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8240).

Feature	Radeon HD 4550	Radeon HD 8240
G3D Mark Score	236	246+4%
Architecture	TeraScale 2	GCN 1.0
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1440+13%	1280
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.088 TFLOPS	2.56 TFLOPS+23%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	72	80+11%
L1 Cache	144 KB	320 KB+122%
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon HD 4550	Radeon HD 8240
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 4550 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8240 carries 512 MB. Radeon HD 4550 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 4550 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 8240.

Feature	Radeon HD 4550	Radeon HD 8240
VRAM Capacity	1 GB+100%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 4550 draws 151W versus the Radeon HD 8240's 200W — a 27.9% difference. The Radeon HD 4550 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 4550) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8240). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	Radeon HD 4550	Radeon HD 8240
TDP	151W-25%	200W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	1x 6-pin
Perf/Watt	1.6+33%	1.2

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon HD 4550 came in at $59, while the Radeon HD 8240 launched at $50. On MSRP, Radeon HD 8240 was 15.3% cheaper ($9 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.0 (Radeon HD 4550) vs 4.9 (Radeon HD 8240) — the Radeon HD 8240 offers 22.5% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 8240 (2012 vs 2009).

Feature	Radeon HD 4550	Radeon HD 8240
MSRP	$59	$50-15%
Performance per Dollar	4.0	4.9+23%
Codename	Cypress	Pitcairn
Release	September 30 2009	March 5 2012
Ranking	#682	#460

Search Radeon HD 4550 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 8240 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.