CPU
GPU
Radeon E6465
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 4550
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 4550
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 4550 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon E6465.
| Insight | Radeon E6465 | Radeon HD 4550 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 4550 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 4550 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $49), it costs 69% less, resulting in a 233.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon E6465 | Radeon HD 4550 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+233.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon E6465 and Radeon HD 4550
Radeon E6465
The Radeon E6465 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 2 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 231 points. Launch price was $239.99.
Radeon HD 4550
The Radeon HD 4550 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 30 2009. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1440 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 151W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 236 points. Launch price was $299.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon E6465 scores 231 and the Radeon HD 4550 reaches 236 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon E6465 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon HD 4550 uses TeraScale 2, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 480 (Radeon E6465) vs 1,440 (Radeon HD 4550).
| Feature | Radeon E6465 | Radeon HD 4550 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 231 | 236+2% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 480 | 1440+200% |
| ROPs | 8 | 32+300% |
| TMUs | 24 | 72+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon E6465 | Radeon HD 4550 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon E6465 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 4550 has 1 GB. The Radeon HD 4550 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon E6465 | Radeon HD 4550 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon E6465 draws 45W versus the Radeon HD 4550's 151W — a 108.2% difference. The Radeon E6465 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon E6465) vs 350W (Radeon HD 4550). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Radeon E6465 | Radeon HD 4550 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 45W-70% | 151W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 168mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 5.1+219% | 1.6 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon E6465 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the Radeon HD 4550 launched at $59 and now averages $15. The Radeon HD 4550 costs 69.4% less ($34 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 4.7 (Radeon E6465) vs 15.7 (Radeon HD 4550) — the Radeon HD 4550 offers 234% better value. The Radeon E6465 is the newer GPU (2011 vs 2009).
| Feature | Radeon E6465 | Radeon HD 4550 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $59 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49 | $15-69% |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.7 | 15.7+234% |
| Codename | Turks | Cypress |
| Release | May 2 2011 | September 30 2009 |
| Ranking | #923 | #682 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon E6465 and Radeon HD 4550
