
Quadro FX 4500 X2

Radeon E6465
Quadro FX 4500 X2 vs Radeon E6465 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro FX 4500 X2 vs Radeon E6465 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro FX 4500 X2 vs Radeon E6465: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro FX 4500 X2
2008Why buy it
- ✅7.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2008 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌320% higher power demand at 189W vs 45W.
Radeon E6465
2011Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 189W, a 144W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: TeraScale 2 (2009−2015) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 4500 X2 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,799 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro FX 4500 X2 vs Radeon E6465 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 4500 X2
The Quadro FX 4500 X2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 236 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Radeon E6465
The Radeon E6465 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 2 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 231 points. Launch price was $239.99.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro FX 4500 X2 scores 236 and the Radeon E6465 reaches 231 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 4500 X2 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon E6465 uses TeraScale 2, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 4500 X2) vs 480 (Radeon E6465).
| Feature | Quadro FX 4500 X2 | Radeon E6465 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 236+2% | 231 |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 240 | 480+100% |
| ROPs | 32+300% | 8 |
| TMUs | 80+233% | 24 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 4500 X2 | Radeon E6465 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro FX 4500 X2 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon E6465 carries 512 MB. Quadro FX 4500 X2 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 4500 X2 and 64-bit on the Radeon E6465.
| Feature | Quadro FX 4500 X2 | Radeon E6465 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+700% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 4500 X2 draws 189W versus the Radeon E6465's 45W — a 123.1% difference. The Radeon E6465 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 4500 X2) vs 350W (Radeon E6465). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro FX 4500 X2 | Radeon E6465 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 189W | 45W-76% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 168mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Perf/Watt | 1.2 | 5.1+325% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro FX 4500 X2 came in at $2799, while the Radeon E6465 launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon E6465 was 100+% cheaper ($2799 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.1 (Quadro FX 4500 X2) vs Infinity (Radeon E6465) — the Radeon E6465 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon E6465 (2011 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro FX 4500 X2 | Radeon E6465 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2799 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.1 | Infinity |
| Codename | GT200B | Turks |
| Release | November 11 2008 | May 2 2011 |
| Ranking | #815 | #923 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














