Quadro FX 4500 X2 vs Quadro NVS 510M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 4500 X2 vs Quadro NVS 510M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 4500 X2 vs Quadro NVS 510M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 4500 X2

2008

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 1 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2008 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌89% higher power demand at 189W vs 100W.

Quadro NVS 510M

2011

Why buy it

✅Draws 100W instead of 189W, a 89W reduction.
✅More future proof: Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,799 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro NVS 510M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.8% in PassMark G3D (238 vs 236), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro FX 4500 X2 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 1 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro FX 4500 X2 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Quadro NVS 510M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Quadro FX 4500 X2 vs Quadro NVS 510M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 4500 X2

The Quadro FX 4500 X2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 236 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Quadro NVS 510M

The Quadro NVS 510M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 450 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 238 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 4500 X2 scores 236 and the Quadro NVS 510M reaches 238 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 4500 X2 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Quadro NVS 510M uses Fermi 2.0, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 4500 X2) vs 384 (Quadro NVS 510M). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 4500 X2) vs 0.6912 TFLOPS (Quadro NVS 510M).

Feature	Quadro FX 4500 X2	Quadro NVS 510M
G3D Mark Score	236	238
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	Fermi 2.0
Process Node	55 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	240	384+60%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6221 TFLOPS	0.6912 TFLOPS+11%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	80+67%	48
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 4500 X2	Quadro NVS 510M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 4500 X2 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro NVS 510M carries 1 GB. Quadro FX 4500 X2 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 4500 X2 and 64-bit on the Quadro NVS 510M. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro FX 4500 X2) vs 512 KB (Quadro NVS 510M) — the Quadro NVS 510M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro FX 4500 X2	Quadro NVS 510M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+300%	1 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 4500 X2 draws 189W versus the Quadro NVS 510M's 100W — a 61.6% difference. The Quadro NVS 510M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 4500 X2) vs 350W (Quadro NVS 510M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Quadro FX 4500 X2	Quadro NVS 510M
TDP	189W	100W-47%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt	1.2	2.4+100%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro NVS 510M (2011 vs 2008).

Feature	Quadro FX 4500 X2	Quadro NVS 510M
MSRP	$2799	—
Codename	GT200B	GF110
Release	November 11 2008	February 22 2011
Ranking	#815	#733

Search Quadro FX 4500 X2 on Amazon

Search Quadro NVS 510M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.