Quadro FX 4500 X2
VS
Radeon HD 8240

Quadro FX 4500 X2 vs Radeon HD 8240

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 4500 X2

2008Core: 610 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 8240

2012Core: 1000 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 4500 X2 is positioned at rank 418 and the Radeon HD 8240 is on rank 232, so the Radeon HD 8240 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 4500 X2

#403
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
184662%
#418
Quadro FX 4500 X2
MSRP: $2799|Avg: $2799
100%
#419
Quadro FX 5500
MSRP: $2999|Avg: $30
100%
#420
Quadro FX 1000
MSRP: $500|Avg: $30
88%
#421
Quadro FX 3400/4400
MSRP: $1799|Avg: $50
75%
#422
Quadro FX 1300
MSRP: $599|Avg: $15
75%
#423
Quadro FX 4000
MSRP: $2199|Avg: $50
63%
#424
RADEON IGP 320
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
50%
#425
Quadro FX 500/FX 600
MSRP: $449|Avg: $15
25%
#426
Quadro FX 2000
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $40
13%
#427
GRID V100-8Q
MSRP: $10000|Avg: $10000
0%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8240

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
1474%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1416%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
1400%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1398%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1395%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
1387%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
1369%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1364%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1352%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
1348%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
1332%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1329%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
1305%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1304%
#99
Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U
MSRP: $450|Avg: $450
92%
#217
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
1626%
#232
Radeon HD 8240
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
100%
#233
Radeon HD 6320
MSRP: $30|Avg: $5
100%
#234
Radeon R7 M360
MSRP: $120|Avg: $30
99%
#235
Radeon R4E
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
99%
#236
Radeon HD4650
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
98%
#237
Radeon HD 4850
MSRP: $199|Avg: $199
97%
#238
Radeon R5 M240
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
96%
#239
Radeon HD 4350
MSRP: $35|Avg: $10
96%
#240
RADEON HD 6350
MSRP: $30|Avg: $30
96%
#241
Radeon HD 4870
MSRP: $299|Avg: $25
94%
#244
Radeon HD 7560D
MSRP: $101|Avg: $15
91%
#246
GeForce GTS 250
MSRP: $129|Avg: $20
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon HD 8240 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro FX 4500 X2 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightQuadro FX 4500 X2Radeon HD 8240
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-4.2%)
Leading raw performance (+4.2%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+700%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon HD 8240 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 8240 holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $2,799), it costs 98% less, resulting in a 5735.2% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightQuadro FX 4500 X2Radeon HD 8240
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+5735.2%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($2,799)
More affordable ($50)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 4500 X2 and Radeon HD 8240

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 4500 X2

The Quadro FX 4500 X2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 236 points. Launch price was $3,499.

AMD

Radeon HD 8240

The Radeon HD 8240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 5 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 246 points. Launch price was $349.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 4500 X2 scores 236 and the Radeon HD 8240 reaches 246 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 4500 X2 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon HD 8240 uses GCN 1.0, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 4500 X2) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 8240). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 4500 X2) vs 2.56 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8240).

FeatureQuadro FX 4500 X2Radeon HD 8240
G3D Mark Score
236
246+4%
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
55 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
240
1280+433%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6221 TFLOPS
2.56 TFLOPS+312%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
80
80
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro FX 4500 X2Radeon HD 8240
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 4500 X2 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8240 has 512 MB. The Quadro FX 4500 X2 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro FX 4500 X2) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 8240) — the Radeon HD 8240 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro FX 4500 X2Radeon HD 8240
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+700%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 4500 X2 draws 189W versus the Radeon HD 8240's 200W — a 5.7% difference. The Quadro FX 4500 X2 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 4500 X2) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8240). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureQuadro FX 4500 X2Radeon HD 8240
TDP
189W-6%
200W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Perf/Watt
1.2
1.2
💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro FX 4500 X2 launched at $2799 MSRP and currently averages $2799, while the Radeon HD 8240 launched at $50 and now averages $50. The Radeon HD 8240 costs 98.2% less ($2749 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.1 (Quadro FX 4500 X2) vs 4.9 (Radeon HD 8240) — the Radeon HD 8240 offers 4800% better value. The Radeon HD 8240 is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2008).

FeatureQuadro FX 4500 X2Radeon HD 8240
MSRP
$2799
$50-98%
Avg Price (30d)
$2799
$50-98%
Performance per Dollar
0.1
4.9+4800%
Codename
GT200B
Pitcairn
Release
November 11 2008
March 5 2012
Ranking
#815
#460