Quadro NVS 510M vs Radeon E6465

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro NVS 510M vs Radeon E6465 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro NVS 510M vs Radeon E6465: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro NVS 510M

2011

Why buy it

✅7.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
✅More future proof: Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌122.2% higher power demand at 100W vs 45W.

Radeon E6465

2011

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 100W, a 55W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro NVS 510M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro NVS 510M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 7.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3% in PassMark G3D (238 vs 231), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro NVS 510M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro NVS 510M makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Quadro NVS 510M vs Radeon E6465 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro NVS 510M

The Quadro NVS 510M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 450 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 238 points.

Radeon E6465

The Radeon E6465 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 2 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 231 points. Launch price was $239.99.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro NVS 510M scores 238 and the Radeon E6465 reaches 231 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro NVS 510M is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Radeon E6465 uses TeraScale 2, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Quadro NVS 510M) vs 480 (Radeon E6465).

Feature	Quadro NVS 510M	Radeon E6465
G3D Mark Score	238+3%	231
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	TeraScale 2
Process Node	40 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	384	480+25%
ROPs	32+300%	8
TMUs	48+100%	24

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro NVS 510M	Radeon E6465
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro NVS 510M has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon E6465 carries 512 MB. Quadro NVS 510M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro NVS 510M and 64-bit on the Radeon E6465.

Feature	Quadro NVS 510M	Radeon E6465
VRAM Capacity	1 GB+100%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro NVS 510M draws 100W versus the Radeon E6465's 45W — a 75.9% difference. The Radeon E6465 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro NVS 510M) vs 350W (Radeon E6465). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.