Quadro NVS 510M vs Radeon HD4650

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro NVS 510M vs Radeon HD4650 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro NVS 510M vs Radeon HD4650: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro NVS 510M

2011

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 100W instead of 200W, a 100W reduction.
✅More future proof: Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD4650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 4.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $50 MSRP).

Radeon HD4650

2010

Why buy it

✅2.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌100% higher power demand at 200W vs 100W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD4650 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 2.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.8% in PassMark G3D (240 vs 238), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro NVS 510M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM and a newer 2011 generation instead of 2010. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD4650 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD4650 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro NVS 510M has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro NVS 510M vs Radeon HD4650 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro NVS 510M

The Quadro NVS 510M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 450 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 238 points.

Radeon HD4650

The Radeon HD4650 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 240 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro NVS 510M scores 238 and the Radeon HD4650 reaches 240 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro NVS 510M is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Radeon HD4650 uses TeraScale 3, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Quadro NVS 510M) vs 1,408 (Radeon HD4650). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (Quadro NVS 510M) vs 2.253 TFLOPS (Radeon HD4650).

Feature	Quadro NVS 510M	Radeon HD4650
G3D Mark Score	238	240
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	TeraScale 3
Process Node	40 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	384	1408+267%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6912 TFLOPS	2.253 TFLOPS+226%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	48	88+83%
L1 Cache	768 KB+118%	352 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro NVS 510M	Radeon HD4650
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro NVS 510M has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD4650 carries 512 MB. Quadro NVS 510M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro NVS 510M and 128-bit on the Radeon HD4650.

Feature	Quadro NVS 510M	Radeon HD4650
VRAM Capacity	1 GB+100%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro NVS 510M draws 100W versus the Radeon HD4650's 200W — a 66.7% difference. The Quadro NVS 510M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro NVS 510M) vs 350W (Radeon HD4650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Quadro NVS 510M	Radeon HD4650
TDP	100W-50%	200W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	193mm
Slots	—	1
Perf/Watt	2.4+100%	1.2

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro NVS 510M (2011 vs 2010).

Feature	Quadro NVS 510M	Radeon HD4650
MSRP	—	$50
Codename	GF110	Cayman
Release	February 22 2011	December 14 2010
Ranking	#733	#623

Search Quadro NVS 510M on Amazon

Search Radeon HD4650 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.