Quadro NVS 510M vs Radeon R2

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro NVS 510M vs Radeon R2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro NVS 510M vs Radeon R2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro NVS 510M

2011

Why buy it

✅8.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌100% higher power demand at 100W vs 50W.

Radeon R2

2019

Why buy it

✅Quadro NVS 510M is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon R2 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 50W instead of 100W, a 50W reduction.
✅More future proof: GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro NVS 510M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro NVS 510M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 8.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R2 instead at 254 vs 238, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon R2 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 28nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R2 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Quadro NVS 510M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Quadro NVS 510M vs Radeon R2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro NVS 510M

The Quadro NVS 510M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 450 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 238 points.

Radeon R2

The Radeon R2 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 254 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro NVS 510M scores 238 versus the Radeon R2's 254 — the Radeon R2 leads by 6.7%. The Quadro NVS 510M is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Radeon R2 uses GCN 3.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro NVS 510M) vs 384 (Radeon R2). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (Quadro NVS 510M) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon R2).

Feature	Quadro NVS 510M	Radeon R2
G3D Mark Score	238	254+7%
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	GCN 3.0
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6912 TFLOPS	0.7864 TFLOPS+14%
ROPs	32+300%	8
TMUs	48+100%	24
L1 Cache	768 KB+700%	96 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB+300%	128 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro NVS 510M	Radeon R2
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro NVS 510M has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R2 carries 512 MB. Quadro NVS 510M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro NVS 510M and 64-bit on the Radeon R2. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Quadro NVS 510M) vs 128 KB (Radeon R2) — the Quadro NVS 510M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro NVS 510M	Radeon R2
VRAM Capacity	1 GB+100%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB+300%	128 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro NVS 510M draws 100W versus the Radeon R2's 50W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon R2 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro NVS 510M) vs 350W (Radeon R2). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Quadro NVS 510M	Radeon R2
TDP	100W	50W-50%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	0mm
Slots	—	0
Perf/Watt	2.4	5.1+113%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon R2 (2019 vs 2011).

Feature	Quadro NVS 510M	Radeon R2
MSRP	—	$0
Codename	GF110	Polaris 24
Release	February 22 2011	May 13 2019
Ranking	#733	#858

Search Quadro NVS 510M on Amazon

Search Radeon R2 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.