Quadro NVS 510M vs Radeon HD 8280E

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro NVS 510M vs Radeon HD 8280E FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro NVS 510M vs Radeon HD 8280E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro NVS 510M

2011

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 8280E across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
❌100% higher power demand at 100W vs 50W.

Radeon HD 8280E

2013

Why buy it

✅0.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 50W instead of 100W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 8280E is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 0.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 7.6% in PassMark G3D (256 vs 238), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro NVS 510M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 8280E makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 8280E is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro NVS 510M has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro NVS 510M vs Radeon HD 8280E Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro NVS 510M

The Quadro NVS 510M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 450 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 238 points.

Radeon HD 8280E

The Radeon HD 8280E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 775 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 256 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro NVS 510M scores 238 versus the Radeon HD 8280E's 256 — the Radeon HD 8280E leads by 7.6%. The Quadro NVS 510M is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Radeon HD 8280E uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro NVS 510M) vs 640 (Radeon HD 8280E). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (Quadro NVS 510M) vs 0.992 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8280E).

Feature	Quadro NVS 510M	Radeon HD 8280E
G3D Mark Score	238	256+8%
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	640+67%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6912 TFLOPS	0.992 TFLOPS+44%
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	48+20%	40
L1 Cache	768 KB+380%	160 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro NVS 510M	Radeon HD 8280E
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro NVS 510M has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8280E carries 512 MB. Quadro NVS 510M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro NVS 510M and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 8280E. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Quadro NVS 510M) vs 256 KB (Radeon HD 8280E) — the Quadro NVS 510M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro NVS 510M	Radeon HD 8280E
VRAM Capacity	1 GB+100%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro NVS 510M draws 100W versus the Radeon HD 8280E's 50W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon HD 8280E is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro NVS 510M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8280E). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	Quadro NVS 510M	Radeon HD 8280E
TDP	100W	50W-50%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	—	1mm
Slots	—	0
Perf/Watt	2.4	5.1+113%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon HD 8280E (2013 vs 2011).

Feature	Quadro NVS 510M	Radeon HD 8280E
MSRP	—	$150
Codename	GF110	Venus
Release	February 22 2011	April 1 2013
Ranking	#733	#745

Search Quadro NVS 510M on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 8280E on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.