
Quadro NVS 510M

Radeon HD 4650
Quadro NVS 510M vs Radeon HD 4650 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro NVS 510M vs Radeon HD 4650 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro NVS 510M vs Radeon HD 4650: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro NVS 510M
2011Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 200W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 4650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 3.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $70 MSRP).
Radeon HD 4650
2010Why buy it
- ✅22.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($70 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌100% higher power demand at 200W vs 100W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro NVS 510M vs Radeon HD 4650 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro NVS 510M
The Quadro NVS 510M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 450 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 238 points.

Radeon HD 4650
The Radeon HD 4650 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 248 points. Launch price was $299.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro NVS 510M scores 238 and the Radeon HD 4650 reaches 248 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro NVS 510M is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Radeon HD 4650 uses TeraScale 3, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Quadro NVS 510M) vs 1,408 (Radeon HD 4650). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (Quadro NVS 510M) vs 2.253 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4650).
| Feature | Quadro NVS 510M | Radeon HD 4650 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 238 | 248+4% |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 1408+267% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6912 TFLOPS | 2.253 TFLOPS+226% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 48 | 88+83% |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+118% | 352 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro NVS 510M | Radeon HD 4650 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 1 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro NVS 510M and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 4650.
| Feature | Quadro NVS 510M | Radeon HD 4650 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro NVS 510M draws 100W versus the Radeon HD 4650's 200W — a 66.7% difference. The Quadro NVS 510M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro NVS 510M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 4650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Quadro NVS 510M | Radeon HD 4650 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-50% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 168mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Perf/Watt | 2.4+100% | 1.2 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Quadro NVS 510M (2011 vs 2010).
| Feature | Quadro NVS 510M | Radeon HD 4650 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $70 |
| Codename | GF110 | Cayman |
| Release | February 22 2011 | December 14 2010 |
| Ranking | #733 | #623 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














