CPU
GPU
Quadro NVS 510M
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 4650
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro NVS 510M is positioned at rank 273 and the Radeon HD 4650 is on rank 275, so the Quadro NVS 510M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro NVS 510M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 4650
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 4650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro NVS 510M.
| Insight | Quadro NVS 510M | Radeon HD 4650 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon HD 4650 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro NVS 510M and Radeon HD 4650
Quadro NVS 510M
The Quadro NVS 510M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 450 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 238 points.
Radeon HD 4650
The Radeon HD 4650 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 248 points. Launch price was $299.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro NVS 510M scores 238 and the Radeon HD 4650 reaches 248 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro NVS 510M is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Radeon HD 4650 uses TeraScale 3, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Quadro NVS 510M) vs 1,408 (Radeon HD 4650). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (Quadro NVS 510M) vs 2.253 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4650).
| Feature | Quadro NVS 510M | Radeon HD 4650 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 238 | 248+4% |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 1408+267% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6912 TFLOPS | 2.253 TFLOPS+226% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 48 | 88+83% |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+118% | 352 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro NVS 510M | Radeon HD 4650 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 1 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Quadro NVS 510M | Radeon HD 4650 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro NVS 510M draws 100W versus the Radeon HD 4650's 200W — a 66.7% difference. The Quadro NVS 510M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro NVS 510M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 4650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Quadro NVS 510M | Radeon HD 4650 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-50% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 168mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Perf/Watt | 2.4+100% | 1.2 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro NVS 510M is the newer GPU (2011 vs 2010).
| Feature | Quadro NVS 510M | Radeon HD 4650 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $70 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $15 |
| Codename | GF110 | Cayman |
| Release | February 22 2011 | December 14 2010 |
| Ranking | #733 | #623 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro NVS 510M and Radeon HD 4650
