Quadro NVS 510M vs Radeon HD 8240

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro NVS 510M vs Radeon HD 8240 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro NVS 510M vs Radeon HD 8240: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro NVS 510M

2011

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 100W instead of 200W, a 100W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 8240 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 4.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $50 MSRP).

Radeon HD 8240

2012

Why buy it

✅22.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌100% higher power demand at 200W vs 100W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 8240 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 22.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3.4% in PassMark G3D (246 vs 238), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro NVS 510M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 8240 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 8240 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro NVS 510M has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro NVS 510M vs Radeon HD 8240 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro NVS 510M

The Quadro NVS 510M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 450 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 238 points.

Radeon HD 8240

The Radeon HD 8240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 5 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 246 points. Launch price was $349.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro NVS 510M scores 238 and the Radeon HD 8240 reaches 246 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro NVS 510M is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Radeon HD 8240 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro NVS 510M) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 8240). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (Quadro NVS 510M) vs 2.56 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8240).

Feature	Quadro NVS 510M	Radeon HD 8240
G3D Mark Score	238	246+3%
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	1280+233%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6912 TFLOPS	2.56 TFLOPS+270%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	48	80+67%
L1 Cache	768 KB+140%	320 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro NVS 510M	Radeon HD 8240
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro NVS 510M has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8240 carries 512 MB. Quadro NVS 510M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro NVS 510M and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 8240.

Feature	Quadro NVS 510M	Radeon HD 8240
VRAM Capacity	1 GB+100%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro NVS 510M draws 100W versus the Radeon HD 8240's 200W — a 66.7% difference. The Quadro NVS 510M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro NVS 510M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8240). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	Quadro NVS 510M	Radeon HD 8240
TDP	100W-50%	200W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Perf/Watt	2.4+100%	1.2

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon HD 8240 (2012 vs 2011).

Feature	Quadro NVS 510M	Radeon HD 8240
MSRP	—	$50
Codename	GF110	Pitcairn
Release	February 22 2011	March 5 2012
Ranking	#733	#460

Search Quadro NVS 510M on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 8240 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.