CPU
GPU
Radeon E6465
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 6410D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6410D
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 6410D is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon E6465.
| Insight | Radeon E6465 | Radeon HD 6410D |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon E6465 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon E6465 holds the technical lead. Priced at $49 (vs $70), it costs 30% less, resulting in a 39.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon E6465 | Radeon HD 6410D |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+39.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($49) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($70) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon E6465 and Radeon HD 6410D
Radeon E6465
The Radeon E6465 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 2 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 231 points. Launch price was $239.99.
Radeon HD 6410D
The Radeon HD 6410D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 8 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 830 MHz. It has 1536 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 237 points. Launch price was $699.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon E6465 scores 231 and the Radeon HD 6410D reaches 237 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon E6465 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon HD 6410D uses TeraScale 3, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 480 (Radeon E6465) vs 1,536 (Radeon HD 6410D).
| Feature | Radeon E6465 | Radeon HD 6410D |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 231 | 237+3% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 480 | 1536 ×2+220% |
| ROPs | 8 | 32 ×2+300% |
| TMUs | 24 | 96 ×2+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon E6465 | Radeon HD 6410D |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon E6465 | Radeon HD 6410D |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon E6465 draws 45W versus the Radeon HD 6410D's 375W — a 157.1% difference. The Radeon E6465 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon E6465) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6410D). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Radeon E6465 | Radeon HD 6410D |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 45W-88% | 375W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 168mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 5.1+750% | 0.6 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon E6465 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the Radeon HD 6410D launched at $70 and now averages $70. The Radeon E6465 costs 30% less ($21 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 4.7 (Radeon E6465) vs 3.4 (Radeon HD 6410D) — the Radeon E6465 offers 38.2% better value.
| Feature | Radeon E6465 | Radeon HD 6410D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $70 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49-30% | $70 |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.7+38% | 3.4 |
| Codename | Turks | Antilles |
| Release | May 2 2011 | March 8 2011 |
| Ranking | #923 | #583 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon E6465 and Radeon HD 6410D
