Radeon E6465 vs Radeon HD4650

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon E6465 vs Radeon HD4650 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon E6465 vs Radeon HD4650: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon E6465

2011

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 200W, a 155W reduction.
✅Measures 168mm instead of 193mm, a 25mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
✅More future proof: TeraScale 2 (2009−2015) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD4650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 4.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $50 MSRP).

Radeon HD4650

2010

Why buy it

✅10.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌344.4% higher power demand at 200W vs 45W.
❌14.9% longer card at 193mm vs 168mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD4650 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 10.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3.9% in PassMark G3D (240 vs 231), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon E6465 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2011 generation instead of 2010. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD4650 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD4650 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon E6465 has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon E6465 vs Radeon HD4650 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon E6465

The Radeon E6465 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 2 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 231 points. Launch price was $239.99.

Radeon HD4650

The Radeon HD4650 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 240 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon E6465 scores 231 and the Radeon HD4650 reaches 240 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon E6465 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon HD4650 uses TeraScale 3, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 480 (Radeon E6465) vs 1,408 (Radeon HD4650).

Feature	Radeon E6465	Radeon HD4650
G3D Mark Score	231	240+4%
Architecture	TeraScale 2	TeraScale 3
Process Node	40 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	480	1408+193%
ROPs	8	32+300%
TMUs	24	88+267%
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon E6465	Radeon HD4650
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon E6465 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD4650.

Feature	Radeon E6465	Radeon HD4650
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11_0 (Radeon E6465) vs 10.1 (Radeon HD4650). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

Feature	Radeon E6465	Radeon HD4650
DirectX	11_0+9%	10.1
Max Displays	4+100%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: UVD 3 (Radeon E6465) vs UVD 2.2 (Radeon HD4650). Decoder: UVD 3 vs UVD 2.2.

Feature	Radeon E6465	Radeon HD4650
Encoder	UVD 3	UVD 2.2
Decoder	UVD 3	UVD 2.2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon E6465 draws 45W versus the Radeon HD4650's 200W — a 126.5% difference. The Radeon E6465 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon E6465) vs 350W (Radeon HD4650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 193mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.

Feature	Radeon E6465	Radeon HD4650
TDP	45W-78%	200W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	168mm	193mm
Slots	1	1
Perf/Watt	5.1+325%	1.2

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon E6465 came in at $0, while the Radeon HD4650 launched at $50. On MSRP, Radeon E6465 was 100+% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Radeon E6465) vs 4.8 (Radeon HD4650) — the Radeon E6465 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon E6465 (2011 vs 2010).

Feature	Radeon E6465	Radeon HD4650
MSRP	$0-100%	$50
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	4.8
Codename	Turks	Cayman
Release	May 2 2011	December 14 2010
Ranking	#923	#623

Search Radeon E6465 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD4650 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.