
GeForce GT 220

Radeon E6465
GeForce GT 220 vs Radeon E6465 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GT 220 vs Radeon E6465 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GT 220 vs Radeon E6465: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GT 220
2008Why buy it
- ✅7.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($69 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌424.4% higher power demand at 236W vs 45W.
Radeon E6465
2011Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 236W, a 191W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: TeraScale 2 (2009−2015) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GT 220 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 3.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $69 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 220 vs Radeon E6465 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 220
The GeForce GT 220 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 16 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 236W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 222 points. Launch price was $649.

Radeon E6465
The Radeon E6465 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 2 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 231 points. Launch price was $239.99.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 220 scores 222 and the Radeon E6465 reaches 231 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 220 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon E6465 uses TeraScale 2, both on 65 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 240 (GeForce GT 220) vs 480 (Radeon E6465).
| Feature | GeForce GT 220 | Radeon E6465 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 222 | 231+4% |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 65 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 240 | 480+100% |
| ROPs | 32+300% | 8 |
| TMUs | 80+233% | 24 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GT 220 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon E6465 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GT 220 | Radeon E6465 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 220 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon E6465 carries 512 MB. GeForce GT 220 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 220 and 64-bit on the Radeon E6465.
| Feature | GeForce GT 220 | Radeon E6465 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce GT 220) vs 11_0 (Radeon E6465). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GT 220 | Radeon E6465 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 11_0+9% |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce GT 220) vs UVD 3 (Radeon E6465). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs UVD 3.
| Feature | GeForce GT 220 | Radeon E6465 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | UVD 3 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | UVD 3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 220 draws 236W versus the Radeon E6465's 45W — a 135.9% difference. The Radeon E6465 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 220) vs 350W (Radeon E6465). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GT 220 | Radeon E6465 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 236W | 45W-81% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | 168mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.9 | 5.1+467% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GT 220 came in at $69, while the Radeon E6465 launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon E6465 was 100+% cheaper ($69 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.2 (GeForce GT 220) vs Infinity (Radeon E6465) — the Radeon E6465 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon E6465 (2011 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce GT 220 | Radeon E6465 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $69 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.2 | Infinity |
| Codename | GT200 | Turks |
| Release | June 16 2008 | May 2 2011 |
| Ranking | #802 | #923 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














