GeForce GT 220 vs Radeon E6465

GeForce GT 220

2008Core: 602 MHz

Radeon E6465

2011Core: 600 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

GeForce GT 220

236

222

0.0%

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

Radeon E6465

231

+4.1%

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce GT 220 is positioned at rank #287 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 220

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

MSRP: $399|Avg: $280

2253%

GeForce RTX 5060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

2164%

Radeon RX 5600 XT

MSRP: $279|Avg: $180

2139%

Radeon RX 9060

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

2135%

GeForce RTX 5050

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

2131%

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

MSRP: $249|Avg: $150

2119%

Arc A580

MSRP: $179|Avg: $179

2092%

Radeon RX 9060 XT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

2084%

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

2065%

#10

Radeon RX 7600

MSRP: $269|Avg: $250

2060%

#11

Radeon RX 6600

MSRP: $329|Avg: $180

2035%

#12

GeForce RTX 4060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

2030%

#13

Arc B570

MSRP: $219|Avg: $219

1994%

#14

Arc B580

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

1993%

#272

Radeon R5 430 OEM

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13

2484%

#287

GeForce GT 220

MSRP: $69|Avg: $49

100%

#288

Radeon R7 A10-8850

MSRP: $250|Avg: $250

96%

#290

GeForce G210

MSRP: $50|Avg: $15

92%

#291

Radeon HD 4850 X2

MSRP: $399|Avg: $40

88%

#292

Radeon HD 4330

MSRP: $50|Avg: $9

84%

#293

GeForce GTX 260

MSRP: $449|Avg: $449

83%

#294

Radeon HD 8490

MSRP: $99|Avg: $35

83%

#295

Radeon HD 8650D

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

82%

#297

Radeon HDG 4670

MSRP: $67|Avg: $15

79%

#298

Radeon HD 3870

MSRP: $219|Avg: $15

78%

#299

Radeon HD 4250

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

76%

#300

Radeon HD 6310

MSRP: $50|Avg: $50

76%

#301

GeForce GTX 295

MSRP: $499|Avg: $50

75%

#302

Radeon HD 4870 X2

MSRP: $550|Avg: $550

74%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon E6465 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GT 220 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	GeForce GT 220	Radeon E6465
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.1%)	✅Leading raw performance (+4.1%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon E6465 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon E6465 holds the technical lead. Priced at $49 (vs $49), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 4.1% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	GeForce GT 220	Radeon E6465
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+4.1%)
Upfront Cost	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GT 220 Benchmark Check

Radeon E6465 Benchmark Check

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 220 and Radeon E6465

GeForce GT 220

The GeForce GT 220 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 16 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 236W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 222 points. Launch price was $649.

Radeon E6465

The Radeon E6465 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 2 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 231 points. Launch price was $239.99.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 220 scores 222 and the Radeon E6465 reaches 231 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 220 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon E6465 uses TeraScale 2, both on 65 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 240 (GeForce GT 220) vs 480 (Radeon E6465).

Feature	GeForce GT 220	Radeon E6465
G3D Mark Score	222	231+4%
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	TeraScale 2
Process Node	65 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	240	480+100%
ROPs	32+300%	8
TMUs	80+233%	24

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GT 220	Radeon E6465
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 220 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon E6465 has 512 MB. The GeForce GT 220 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.

Feature	GeForce GT 220	Radeon E6465
VRAM Capacity	1 GB+100%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce GT 220) vs 11_0 (Radeon E6465). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GT 220	Radeon E6465
DirectX	10.1	11_0+9%
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce GT 220) vs UVD 3 (Radeon E6465). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs UVD 3.

Feature	GeForce GT 220	Radeon E6465
Encoder	No	UVD 3
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP4	UVD 3
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 220 draws 236W versus the Radeon E6465's 45W — a 135.9% difference. The Radeon E6465 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 220) vs 350W (Radeon E6465). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.

Feature	GeForce GT 220	Radeon E6465
TDP	236W	45W-81%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	168mm	168mm
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	1
Temp (Load)	65°C	—
Perf/Watt	0.9	5.1+467%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GT 220 launched at $69 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the Radeon E6465 launched at $0 and now averages $49. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 4.5 (GeForce GT 220) vs 4.7 (Radeon E6465) — the Radeon E6465 offers 4.4% better value. The Radeon E6465 is the newer GPU (2011 vs 2008).