
GeForce GT 220 vs Quadro FX 4500 X2

GeForce GT 220
Popular choices:

Quadro FX 4500 X2
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 220 is positioned at rank 287 and the Quadro FX 4500 X2 is on rank 418, so the GeForce GT 220 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 220
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 4500 X2
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro FX 4500 X2 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 6.3% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (4 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GT 220.
| Insight | GeForce GT 220 | Quadro FX 4500 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-6.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+6.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GT 220 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GT 220 holds the technical lead. Priced at $49 (vs $2,799), it costs 98% less, resulting in a 5273.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GT 220 | Quadro FX 4500 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+5273.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($49) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($2,799) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 220 and Quadro FX 4500 X2

GeForce GT 220
The GeForce GT 220 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 16 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 236W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 222 points. Launch price was $649.

Quadro FX 4500 X2
The Quadro FX 4500 X2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 236 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GT 220 scores 222 versus the Quadro FX 4500 X2's 236 — the Quadro FX 4500 X2 leads by 6.3%. The GeForce GT 220 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Quadro FX 4500 X2 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 65 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 240 (GeForce GT 220) vs 240 (Quadro FX 4500 X2). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 220) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 4500 X2).
| Feature | GeForce GT 220 | Quadro FX 4500 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 222 | 236+6% |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 65 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 240 | 240 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6221 TFLOPS | 0.6221 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80 | 80 |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GT 220 | Quadro FX 4500 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 220 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 4500 X2 has 4 GB. The Quadro FX 4500 X2 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GT 220 | Quadro FX 4500 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 4 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 220 draws 236W versus the Quadro FX 4500 X2's 189W — a 22.1% difference. The Quadro FX 4500 X2 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 220) vs 350W (Quadro FX 4500 X2). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GT 220 | Quadro FX 4500 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 236W | 189W-20% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.9 | 1.2+33% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GT 220 launched at $69 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the Quadro FX 4500 X2 launched at $2799 and now averages $2799. The GeForce GT 220 costs 98.2% less ($2750 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 4.5 (GeForce GT 220) vs 0.1 (Quadro FX 4500 X2) — the GeForce GT 220 offers 4400% better value.
| Feature | GeForce GT 220 | Quadro FX 4500 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $69-98% | $2799 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49-98% | $2799 |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.5+4400% | 0.1 |
| Codename | GT200 | GT200B |
| Release | June 16 2008 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #802 | #815 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















