GeForce GT 220 vs Radeon HD 4550

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 220 vs Radeon HD 4550 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 220 vs Radeon HD 4550: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 220

2008

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 4550 across 43 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
16.9% HIGHER MSRP
$69 MSRPvs$59 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.2 vs 4.0 G3D/$ ($69 MSRP vs $59 MSRP).
❌56.3% higher power demand at 236W vs 151W.

Radeon HD 4550

2009

Why buy it

✅1.0% more average FPS across 43 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $10 less on MSRP ($59 MSRP vs $69 MSRP).
✅Delivers 24.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.0 vs 3.2 G3D/$ ($59 MSRP vs $69 MSRP).
✅Draws 151W instead of 236W, a 85W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2009 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 4550 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 1.0% in average FPS across 43 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 6.3% in PassMark G3D (236 vs 222), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GT 220 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 4550 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $10 cheaper on MSRP at $59 vs $69, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 24.3% (4.0 vs 3.2), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 4550 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GT 220 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GT 220 vs Radeon HD 4550 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 220

The GeForce GT 220 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 16 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 236W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 222 points. Launch price was $649.

Radeon HD 4550

The Radeon HD 4550 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 30 2009. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1440 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 151W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 236 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GT 220 scores 222 versus the Radeon HD 4550's 236 — the Radeon HD 4550 leads by 6.3%. The GeForce GT 220 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon HD 4550 uses TeraScale 2, both on 65 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 240 (GeForce GT 220) vs 1,440 (Radeon HD 4550). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 220) vs 2.088 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4550).

Feature	GeForce GT 220	Radeon HD 4550
G3D Mark Score	222	236+6%
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	TeraScale 2
Process Node	65 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	240	1440+500%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6221 TFLOPS	2.088 TFLOPS+236%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	80+11%	72
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 220 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 4550 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GT 220	Radeon HD 4550
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 1 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 220 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 4550. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GT 220) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 4550) — the Radeon HD 4550 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GT 220	Radeon HD 4550
VRAM Capacity	1 GB	1 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 220 draws 236W versus the Radeon HD 4550's 151W — a 43.9% difference. The Radeon HD 4550 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 220) vs 350W (Radeon HD 4550). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	GeForce GT 220	Radeon HD 4550
TDP	236W	151W-36%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	168mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	65°C	—
Perf/Watt	0.9	1.6+78%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 220 came in at $69, while the Radeon HD 4550 launched at $59. On MSRP, Radeon HD 4550 was 14.5% cheaper ($10 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.2 (GeForce GT 220) vs 4.0 (Radeon HD 4550) — the Radeon HD 4550 offers 25% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 4550 (2009 vs 2008).

Feature	GeForce GT 220	Radeon HD 4550
MSRP	$69	$59-14%
Performance per Dollar	3.2	4.0+25%
Codename	GT200	Cypress
Release	June 16 2008	September 30 2009
Ranking	#802	#682

Search GeForce GT 220 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 4550 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.