GeForce GT 220 vs Mobility Radeon HD 3670

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 220 vs Mobility Radeon HD 3670 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 220 vs Mobility Radeon HD 3670: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 220

2008

Why buy it

✅Costs $10 less on MSRP ($69 MSRP vs $79 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌372% higher power demand at 236W vs 50W.

Mobility Radeon HD 3670

2010

Why buy it

✅Draws 50W instead of 236W, a 186W reduction.
✅More future proof: TeraScale 2 (2009−2015) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
14.5% HIGHER MSRP
$79 MSRPvs$69 MSRP

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Mobility Radeon HD 3670 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 4.5% in PassMark G3D (232 vs 222), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GT 220 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GT 220 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $10 cheaper on MSRP at $69 vs $79, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 9.6% (3.2 vs 2.9), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Mobility Radeon HD 3670 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GT 220 vs Mobility Radeon HD 3670 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 220

The GeForce GT 220 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 16 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 236W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 222 points. Launch price was $649.

Mobility Radeon HD 3670

The Mobility Radeon HD 3670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 232 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 220 scores 222 and the Mobility Radeon HD 3670 reaches 232 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 220 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Mobility Radeon HD 3670 uses TeraScale 2, both on 65 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 240 (GeForce GT 220) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 3670). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 220) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 3670).

Feature	GeForce GT 220	Mobility Radeon HD 3670
G3D Mark Score	222	232+5%
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	TeraScale 2
Process Node	65 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	240	800+233%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6221 TFLOPS	1.12 TFLOPS+80%
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	80+100%	40
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 220 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Mobility Radeon HD 3670 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GT 220	Mobility Radeon HD 3670
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 1 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 220 and 128-bit on the Mobility Radeon HD 3670.

Feature	GeForce GT 220	Mobility Radeon HD 3670
VRAM Capacity	1 GB	1 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 220 draws 236W versus the Mobility Radeon HD 3670's 50W — a 130.1% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 3670 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 220) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 3670). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GT 220	Mobility Radeon HD 3670
TDP	236W	50W-79%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	168mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	65°C	—
Perf/Watt	0.9	4.6+411%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 220 came in at $69, while the Mobility Radeon HD 3670 launched at $79. On MSRP, GeForce GT 220 was 12.7% cheaper ($10 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.2 (GeForce GT 220) vs 2.9 (Mobility Radeon HD 3670) — the GeForce GT 220 offers 10.3% better value. The newer card here is Mobility Radeon HD 3670 (2010 vs 2008).

Feature	GeForce GT 220	Mobility Radeon HD 3670
MSRP	$69-13%	$79
Performance per Dollar	3.2+10%	2.9
Codename	GT200	Broadway
Release	June 16 2008	January 7 2010
Ranking	#802	#846

Search GeForce GT 220 on Amazon

Search Mobility Radeon HD 3670 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.