GeForce GT 220 vs Quadro FX 1700
GeForce GT 220
Popular choices:
Quadro FX 1700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 220 is positioned at rank 287 and the Quadro FX 1700 is on rank 395, so the GeForce GT 220 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 220
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 1700
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GT 220 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.8% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro FX 1700.
| Insight | GeForce GT 220 | Quadro FX 1700 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GT 220 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GT 220 holds the technical lead. Priced at $49 (vs $500), it costs 90% less, resulting in a 948.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GT 220 | Quadro FX 1700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+948.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($49) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 220 and Quadro FX 1700
GeForce GT 220
The GeForce GT 220 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 16 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 236W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 222 points. Launch price was $649.
Quadro FX 1700
The Quadro FX 1700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 216 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 220 scores 222 and the Quadro FX 1700 reaches 216 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 220 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Quadro FX 1700 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 65 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 240 (GeForce GT 220) vs 240 (Quadro FX 1700). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 220) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1700).
| Feature | GeForce GT 220 | Quadro FX 1700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 222+3% | 216 |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 65 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 240 | 240 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6221 TFLOPS | 0.6221 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80 | 80 |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GT 220 | Quadro FX 1700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 220 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 1700 has 512 MB. The GeForce GT 220 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GT 220 | Quadro FX 1700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce GT 220) vs 10_0 (Quadro FX 1700). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce GT 220 | Quadro FX 1700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 10_0 |
| Max Displays | 3+50% | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 220 draws 236W versus the Quadro FX 1700's 189W — a 22.1% difference. The Quadro FX 1700 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 220) vs 350W (Quadro FX 1700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GT 220 | Quadro FX 1700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 236W | 189W-20% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | 168mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.9 | 1.1+22% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GT 220 launched at $69 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the Quadro FX 1700 launched at $699 and now averages $500. The GeForce GT 220 costs 90.2% less ($451 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 4.5 (GeForce GT 220) vs 0.4 (Quadro FX 1700) — the GeForce GT 220 offers 1025% better value.
| Feature | GeForce GT 220 | Quadro FX 1700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $69-90% | $699 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49-90% | $500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.5+1025% | 0.4 |
| Codename | GT200 | GT200B |
| Release | June 16 2008 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #802 | #815 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GT 220 and Quadro FX 1700
