GeForce GT 220 vs Quadro FX 1700

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 220 vs Quadro FX 1700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 220 vs Quadro FX 1700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 220

2008

Why buy it

✅Costs $630 less on MSRP ($69 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
✅Delivers 941.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.2 vs 0.3 G3D/$ ($69 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌24.9% higher power demand at 236W vs 189W.

Quadro FX 1700

2008

Why buy it

✅Draws 189W instead of 236W, a 47W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
913% HIGHER MSRP
$699 MSRPvs$69 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.3 vs 3.2 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $69 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GT 220 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.8% in PassMark G3D (222 vs 216), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GT 220 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GT 220 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $630 cheaper on MSRP at $69 vs $699, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 941.2% (3.2 vs 0.3), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GT 220 vs Quadro FX 1700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 220

The GeForce GT 220 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 16 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 236W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 222 points. Launch price was $649.

Quadro FX 1700

The Quadro FX 1700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 216 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 220 scores 222 and the Quadro FX 1700 reaches 216 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 220 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Quadro FX 1700 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 65 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 240 (GeForce GT 220) vs 240 (Quadro FX 1700). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 220) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1700).

Feature	GeForce GT 220	Quadro FX 1700
G3D Mark Score	222+3%	216
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	65 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	240	240
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6221 TFLOPS	0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	80	80
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 220 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 1700 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GT 220	Quadro FX 1700
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 220 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 1700 carries 512 MB. GeForce GT 220 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 220 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 1700.

Feature	GeForce GT 220	Quadro FX 1700
VRAM Capacity	1 GB+100%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce GT 220) vs 10_0 (Quadro FX 1700). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce GT 220	Quadro FX 1700
DirectX	10.1	10_0
Max Displays	3+50%	2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 220 draws 236W versus the Quadro FX 1700's 189W — a 22.1% difference. The Quadro FX 1700 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 220) vs 350W (Quadro FX 1700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.

Feature	GeForce GT 220	Quadro FX 1700
TDP	236W	189W-20%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	168mm	168mm
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	1
Temp (Load)	65°C	—
Perf/Watt	0.9	1.1+22%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 220 came in at $69, while the Quadro FX 1700 launched at $699. On MSRP, GeForce GT 220 was 90.1% cheaper ($630 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.2 (GeForce GT 220) vs 0.3 (Quadro FX 1700) — the GeForce GT 220 offers 966.7% better value.

Feature	GeForce GT 220	Quadro FX 1700
MSRP	$69-90%	$699
Performance per Dollar	3.2+967%	0.3
Codename	GT200	GT200B
Release	June 16 2008	November 11 2008
Ranking	#802	#815

Search GeForce GT 220 on Amazon

Search Quadro FX 1700 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.