Radeon E6465 vs Radeon R3E

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon E6465 vs Radeon R3E FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon E6465 vs Radeon R3E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon E6465

2011

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌16700% longer card at 168mm vs 1mm.

Radeon R3E

2019

Why buy it

✅Radeon E6465 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon R3E is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Measures 1mm instead of 168mm, a 167mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon E6465 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.7% in PassMark G3D (231 vs 225), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon R3E is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 14nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon E6465 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon E6465 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon R3E has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon E6465 vs Radeon R3E Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon E6465

The Radeon E6465 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 2 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 231 points. Launch price was $239.99.

Radeon R3E

The Radeon R3E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 225 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon E6465 scores 231 and the Radeon R3E reaches 225 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon E6465 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon R3E uses GCN 4.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 480 (Radeon E6465) vs 512 (Radeon R3E).

Feature	Radeon E6465	Radeon R3E
G3D Mark Score	231+3%	225
Architecture	TeraScale 2	GCN 4.0
Process Node	40 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	480	512+7%
ROPs	8	16+100%
TMUs	24	32+33%
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon E6465	Radeon R3E
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon E6465 and 64-bit on the Radeon R3E.

Feature	Radeon E6465	Radeon R3E
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11_0 (Radeon E6465) vs 12_0 (Radeon R3E). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

Feature	Radeon E6465	Radeon R3E
DirectX	11_0	12_0+9%
Max Displays	4	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: UVD 3 (Radeon E6465) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R3E). Decoder: UVD 3 vs UVD 4.2.

Feature	Radeon E6465	Radeon R3E
Encoder	UVD 3	VCE 2.0
Decoder	UVD 3	UVD 4.2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon E6465 draws 45W versus the Radeon R3E's 50W — a 10.5% difference. The Radeon E6465 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon E6465) vs 350W (Radeon R3E). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.

Feature	Radeon E6465	Radeon R3E
TDP	45W-10%	50W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	168mm	1mm
Slots	1	0-100%
Perf/Watt	5.1+13%	4.5

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon E6465 came in at $0, while the Radeon R3E launched at $0. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Radeon E6465) vs Infinity (Radeon R3E) — the Radeon R3E offers NaN% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R3E (2019 vs 2011).

Feature	Radeon E6465	Radeon R3E
MSRP	$0	$0
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	Infinity
Codename	Turks	Polaris 23
Release	May 2 2011	May 13 2019
Ranking	#923	#757

Search Radeon E6465 on Amazon

Search Radeon R3E on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.