Radeon E6465
VS
Radeon R3E

Radeon E6465 vs Radeon R3E

AMD

Radeon E6465

2011Core: 600 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R3E

2019Core: 1082 MHzBoost: 1218 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon R3E is significantly newer (2019 vs 2011). The Radeon R3E likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon E6465 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon E6465 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R3E.

InsightRadeon E6465Radeon R3E
Performance
Leading raw performance (+2.7%)
Lower raw frame rates (-2.7%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) (14nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon E6465 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $49 (vs $49), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 2.7% better value per dollar than the Radeon R3E.

InsightRadeon E6465Radeon R3E
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+2.7%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon E6465 and Radeon R3E

AMD

Radeon E6465

The Radeon E6465 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 2 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 231 points. Launch price was $239.99.

AMD

Radeon R3E

The Radeon R3E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 225 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon E6465 scores 231 and the Radeon R3E reaches 225 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon E6465 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon R3E uses GCN 4.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 480 (Radeon E6465) vs 512 (Radeon R3E).

FeatureRadeon E6465Radeon R3E
G3D Mark Score
231+3%
225
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GCN 4.0
Process Node
40 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
480
512+7%
ROPs
8
16+100%
TMUs
24
32+33%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon E6465Radeon R3E
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureRadeon E6465Radeon R3E
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11_0 (Radeon E6465) vs 12_0 (Radeon R3E). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

FeatureRadeon E6465Radeon R3E
DirectX
11_0
12_0+9%
Max Displays
4
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: UVD 3 (Radeon E6465) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R3E). Decoder: UVD 3 vs UVD 4.2.

FeatureRadeon E6465Radeon R3E
Encoder
UVD 3
VCE 2.0
Decoder
UVD 3
UVD 4.2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon E6465 draws 45W versus the Radeon R3E's 50W — a 10.5% difference. The Radeon E6465 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon E6465) vs 350W (Radeon R3E). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.

FeatureRadeon E6465Radeon R3E
TDP
45W-10%
50W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
168mm
1mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Perf/Watt
5.1+13%
4.5
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon E6465 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the Radeon R3E launched at $0 and now averages $49. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 4.7 (Radeon E6465) vs 4.6 (Radeon R3E) — the Radeon E6465 offers 2.2% better value. The Radeon R3E is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2011).

FeatureRadeon E6465Radeon R3E
MSRP
$0
$0
Avg Price (30d)
$49
$49
Performance per Dollar
4.7+2%
4.6
Codename
Turks
Polaris 23
Release
May 2 2011
May 13 2019
Ranking
#923
#757