Radeon HD 4650 AGP
VS
GeForce GT 240M

Radeon HD 4650 AGP vs GeForce GT 240M

AMD

Radeon HD 4650 AGP

2011Core: 600 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GT 240M

2012Core: Up to 625 MHzBoost: 645 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 4650 AGP is positioned at rank 607 and the GeForce GT 240M is on rank 392, so the GeForce GT 240M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 4650 AGP

#597
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
4176%
#599
3785%
#600
3775%
#604
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
3433%
#605
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
3410%
#607
Radeon HD 4650 AGP
MSRP: $80|Avg: $20
100%
#608
GeForce 9800M GS
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
100%
#609
Radeon R7 M270
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
99%
#610
GeForce 9800 GTX
MSRP: $299|Avg: $30
99%
#611
Mobility Radeon HD 5850
MSRP: $299|Avg: $30
98%
#612
98%
#614
GeForce 205
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
97%
#615
GeForce 9600 GSO
MSRP: $129|Avg: $25
96%
#616
GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+
MSRP: $229|Avg: $40
96%
#617
GeForce 9400
MSRP: $59|Avg: $15
96%
#618
GeForce 7350 LE
MSRP: $30|Avg: $10
95%
#620
Mobility Radeon HD 3850
MSRP: $150|Avg: $15
94%
#621
Mobility Radeon HD 4870
MSRP: $299|Avg: $20
93%
#622
GeForce 9800M GT
MSRP: $160|Avg: $5
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 240M

#382
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
1280%
#384
1161%
#385
1158%
#389
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
1053%
#390
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
1045%
#392
GeForce GT 240M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#393
Radeon R9 M485X
MSRP: $450|Avg: $150
100%
#394
Radeon HD 8570D + HD 6670 Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $100
99%
#395
Radeon HD 6650A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
99%
#396
GeForce 920A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
98%
#397
GeForce 930A
MSRP: $150|Avg: $20
98%
#398
Mobility Radeon HD 4650
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
96%
#400
Radeon R9 M290X
MSRP: $400|Avg: $60
95%
#401
Radeon HD 7670
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
95%
#402
Radeon HD 8550G + 8750M Dual
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
94%
#403
Mobility Radeon HD 5000
MSRP: $99|Avg: $20
92%
#404
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
92%
#406
92%
#407
Radeon HD 8650G + 7700M Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GT 240M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.9% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 4650 AGP.

InsightRadeon HD 4650 AGPGeForce GT 240M
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1.9%)
Leading raw performance (+1.9%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GT 240M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 4650 AGP and GeForce GT 240M

AMD

Radeon HD 4650 AGP

The Radeon HD 4650 AGP is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 19 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 208 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 240M

The GeForce GT 240M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from Up to 625 MHz to 645 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 32W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 212 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 4650 AGP scores 208 and the GeForce GT 240M reaches 212 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 4650 AGP is built on TeraScale 2 while the GeForce GT 240M uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 480 (Radeon HD 4650 AGP) vs 384 (GeForce GT 240M). Raw compute: 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4650 AGP) vs 0.48 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 240M).

FeatureRadeon HD 4650 AGPGeForce GT 240M
G3D Mark Score
208
212+2%
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Kepler
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
480+25%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.576 TFLOPS+20%
0.48 TFLOPS
ROPs
8
16+100%
TMUs
24
32+33%
L1 Cache
48 KB+50%
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 4650 AGPGeForce GT 240M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 4650 AGP comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 240M has 1 GB. The GeForce GT 240M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureRadeon HD 4650 AGPGeForce GT 240M
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
1 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (Radeon HD 4650 AGP) vs 11.1 (10_1) (GeForce GT 240M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.

FeatureRadeon HD 4650 AGPGeForce GT 240M
DirectX
10.1
11.1 (10_1)+10%
Max Displays
2
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: UVD 2 (Radeon HD 4650 AGP) vs None (GeForce GT 240M). Decoder: UVD 2 vs PureVideo HD (VP4).

FeatureRadeon HD 4650 AGPGeForce GT 240M
Encoder
UVD 2
None
Decoder
UVD 2
PureVideo HD (VP4)
Codecs
MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 4650 AGP draws 45W versus the GeForce GT 240M's 32W — a 33.8% difference. The GeForce GT 240M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 4650 AGP) vs 350W (GeForce GT 240M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 193mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.

FeatureRadeon HD 4650 AGPGeForce GT 240M
TDP
45W
32W-29%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
193mm
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
70
Perf/Watt
4.6
6.6+43%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GT 240M is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2011).

FeatureRadeon HD 4650 AGPGeForce GT 240M
MSRP
$80
Avg Price (30d)
$20
Codename
Onega
GK107
Release
April 19 2011
March 22 2012
Ranking
#926
#909