
Radeon HD 4650 AGP

Radeon HD 8250
Radeon HD 4650 AGP vs Radeon HD 8250 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon HD 4650 AGP vs Radeon HD 8250 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon HD 4650 AGP vs Radeon HD 8250: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon HD 4650 AGP
2011Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 130W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 8250 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌60% HIGHER MSRP$80 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.6 vs 4.2 G3D/$ ($80 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
Radeon HD 8250
2012Why buy it
- ✅26.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $30 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 63.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.2 vs 2.6 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌188.9% higher power demand at 130W vs 45W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 4650 AGP vs Radeon HD 8250 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon HD 4650 AGP
The Radeon HD 4650 AGP is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 19 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 208 points.

Radeon HD 8250
The Radeon HD 8250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 5 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 212 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 4650 AGP scores 208 and the Radeon HD 8250 reaches 212 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 4650 AGP is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon HD 8250 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 480 (Radeon HD 4650 AGP) vs 1,024 (Radeon HD 8250). Raw compute: 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4650 AGP) vs 1.761 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8250).
| Feature | Radeon HD 4650 AGP | Radeon HD 8250 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 208 | 212+2% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 480 | 1024+113% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.576 TFLOPS | 1.761 TFLOPS+206% |
| ROPs | 8 | 32+300% |
| TMUs | 24 | 64+167% |
| L1 Cache | 48 KB | 256 KB+433% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 4650 AGP | Radeon HD 8250 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 4650 AGP and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 8250. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon HD 4650 AGP) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 8250) — the Radeon HD 8250 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 4650 AGP | Radeon HD 8250 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 4650 AGP draws 45W versus the Radeon HD 8250's 130W — a 97.1% difference. The Radeon HD 4650 AGP is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 4650 AGP) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8250). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Radeon HD 4650 AGP | Radeon HD 8250 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 45W-65% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 193mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 4.6+187% | 1.6 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon HD 4650 AGP came in at $80, while the Radeon HD 8250 launched at $50. On MSRP, Radeon HD 8250 was 37.5% cheaper ($30 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.6 (Radeon HD 4650 AGP) vs 4.2 (Radeon HD 8250) — the Radeon HD 8250 offers 61.5% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 8250 (2012 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon HD 4650 AGP | Radeon HD 8250 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $80 | $50-38% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.6 | 4.2+62% |
| Codename | Onega | Pitcairn |
| Release | April 19 2011 | March 5 2012 |
| Ranking | #926 | #503 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














