GeForce 320M vs Radeon HD 4650 AGP

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 320M is positioned at rank 101 and the Radeon HD 4650 AGP is on rank 607, so the GeForce 320M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 320M

#30

Radeon 8050S

MSRP: $400|Avg: $400

97%

#31

Radeon RX 8050S

MSRP: $400|Avg: $400

96%

#91

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

259%

#93

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

234%

#94

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

234%

#98

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

213%

#99

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

211%

#101

GeForce 320M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#103

Radeon RX 460 (móvel)

MSRP: $99|Avg: $45

99%

#105

GeForce GTX 680M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

98%

#106

Radeon HD 7470M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $12

97%

#110

GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

96%

#114

Radeon RX 470 (móvel)

MSRP: $179|Avg: $40

93%

#116

GeForce GTX 880M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

91%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 4650 AGP

#597

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

4176%

#599

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

3785%

#600

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

3775%

#604

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

3433%

#605

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

3410%

#607

Radeon HD 4650 AGP

MSRP: $80|Avg: $20

100%

#608

GeForce 9800M GS

MSRP: $200|Avg: $50

100%

#609

Radeon R7 M270

MSRP: $300|Avg: $300

99%

#610

GeForce 9800 GTX

MSRP: $299|Avg: $30

99%

#611

Mobility Radeon HD 5850

MSRP: $299|Avg: $30

98%

#612

Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400

MSRP: $49|Avg: $10

98%

#614

GeForce 205

MSRP: $50|Avg: $15

97%

#615

GeForce 9600 GSO

MSRP: $129|Avg: $25

96%

#616

GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+

MSRP: $229|Avg: $40

96%

#617

GeForce 9400

MSRP: $59|Avg: $15

96%

#618

GeForce 7350 LE

MSRP: $30|Avg: $10

95%

#620

Mobility Radeon HD 3850

MSRP: $150|Avg: $15

94%

#621

Mobility Radeon HD 4870

MSRP: $299|Avg: $20

93%

#622

GeForce 9800M GT

MSRP: $160|Avg: $5

92%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce 320M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon HD 4650 AGP offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	GeForce 320M	Radeon HD 4650 AGP
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+1%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce 320M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce 320M Benchmark Check

Radeon HD 4650 AGP Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 320M and Radeon HD 4650 AGP

GeForce 320M

The GeForce 320M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 549 MHz to 549 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 210 points.

Radeon HD 4650 AGP

The Radeon HD 4650 AGP is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 19 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 208 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 320M scores 210 and the Radeon HD 4650 AGP reaches 208 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 320M is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 4650 AGP uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 320M) vs 480 (Radeon HD 4650 AGP). Raw compute: 0.4216 TFLOPS (GeForce 320M) vs 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4650 AGP).

Feature	GeForce 320M	Radeon HD 4650 AGP
G3D Mark Score	210	208
Architecture	Maxwell	TeraScale 2
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	384	480+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.4216 TFLOPS	0.576 TFLOPS+37%
ROPs	8	8
TMUs	24	24
L1 Cache	192 KB+300%	48 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce 320M	Radeon HD 4650 AGP
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 320M comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 4650 AGP has 512 MB. The Radeon HD 4650 AGP offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 320M) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 4650 AGP) — the GeForce 320M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 320M	Radeon HD 4650 AGP
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	0.5 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce 320M) vs 10.1 (Radeon HD 4650 AGP). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce 320M	Radeon HD 4650 AGP
DirectX	10.1	10.1
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 320M) vs UVD 2 (Radeon HD 4650 AGP). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs UVD 2.

Feature	GeForce 320M	Radeon HD 4650 AGP
Encoder	None	UVD 2
Decoder	PureVideo VP4	UVD 2
Codecs	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 320M draws 33W versus the Radeon HD 4650 AGP's 45W — a 30.8% difference. The GeForce 320M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 320M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 4650 AGP). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin.