GeForce 320M vs Mobility Radeon HD 5470

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 320M is positioned at rank 101 and the Mobility Radeon HD 5470 is on rank 484, so the GeForce 320M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 320M

#30

Radeon 8050S

MSRP: $400|Avg: $400

97%

#31

Radeon RX 8050S

MSRP: $400|Avg: $400

96%

#91

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

259%

#93

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

234%

#94

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

234%

#98

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

213%

#99

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

211%

#101

GeForce 320M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#103

Radeon RX 460 (móvel)

MSRP: $99|Avg: $45

99%

#105

GeForce GTX 680M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

98%

#106

Radeon HD 7470M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $12

97%

#110

GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

96%

#114

Radeon RX 470 (móvel)

MSRP: $179|Avg: $40

93%

#116

GeForce GTX 880M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

91%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon HD 5470

#473

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

2252%

#475

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

2042%

#476

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

2037%

#480

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

1852%

#481

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

1839%

#483

Radeon R9 M270X

MSRP: $250|Avg: $40

100%

#484

Mobility Radeon HD 5470

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

100%

#485

Mobility Radeon HD 5000 Serisi

MSRP: $100|Avg: $25

99%

#486

Radeon R7 M260

MSRP: $110|Avg: $110

99%

#487

Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $50

99%

#488

Radeon R7 A10-7800

MSRP: $155|Avg: $30

99%

#489

Radeon HD 8450G + 8670M Dual

MSRP: $100|Avg: $100

99%

#490

Radeon HD 7660G + HD 8670M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

98%

#491

Radeon HD 6450A

MSRP: $55|Avg: $15

98%

#492

Radeon HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

98%

#493

Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7600M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $50

97%

#494

Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8670M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $35

94%

#495

Radeon HD 8180

MSRP: $30|Avg: $5

93%

#498

Radeon R8 M535DX

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

93%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Mobility Radeon HD 5470 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 12.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 320M.

Insight	GeForce 320M	Mobility Radeon HD 5470
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-12.4%)	✅Leading raw performance (+12.4%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Mobility Radeon HD 5470 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce 320M Benchmark Check

Mobility Radeon HD 5470 Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 320M and Mobility Radeon HD 5470

GeForce 320M

The GeForce 320M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 549 MHz to 549 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 210 points.

Mobility Radeon HD 5470

The Mobility Radeon HD 5470 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 236 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce 320M scores 210 versus the Mobility Radeon HD 5470's 236 — the Mobility Radeon HD 5470 leads by 12.4%. The GeForce 320M is built on Maxwell while the Mobility Radeon HD 5470 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 320M) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 5470). Raw compute: 0.4216 TFLOPS (GeForce 320M) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 5470).

Feature	GeForce 320M	Mobility Radeon HD 5470
G3D Mark Score	210	236+12%
Architecture	Maxwell	TeraScale 2
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	384	800+108%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.4216 TFLOPS	1.12 TFLOPS+166%
ROPs	8	16+100%
TMUs	24	40+67%
L1 Cache	192 KB+140%	80 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce 320M	Mobility Radeon HD 5470
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 320M comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the Mobility Radeon HD 5470 has 512 MB. The Mobility Radeon HD 5470 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 320M) vs 0.25 MB (Mobility Radeon HD 5470) — the GeForce 320M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 320M	Mobility Radeon HD 5470
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	0.5 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce 320M) vs 11.0 (Mobility Radeon HD 5470). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce 320M	Mobility Radeon HD 5470
DirectX	10.1	11.0+9%
OpenGL	3.3	4.4+33%
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 320M) vs UVD 2.3 (Mobility Radeon HD 5470). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs UVD 2.3. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce 320M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Mobility Radeon HD 5470).

Feature	GeForce 320M	Mobility Radeon HD 5470
Encoder	None	UVD 2.3
Decoder	PureVideo VP4	UVD 2.3
Codecs	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 320M draws 33W versus the Mobility Radeon HD 5470's 50W — a 41% difference. The GeForce 320M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 320M) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 5470). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.