
GeForce 320M

RADEON HD7450
GeForce 320M vs RADEON HD7450 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 320M vs RADEON HD7450 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 320M vs RADEON HD7450: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 320M
2015Why buy it
- ✅15.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Draws 33W instead of 200W, a 167W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2015 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 4.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
RADEON HD7450
2012Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 320M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌506.1% higher power demand at 200W vs 33W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 320M vs RADEON HD7450 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 320M
The GeForce 320M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 549 MHz to 549 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 210 points.

RADEON HD7450
The RADEON HD7450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1250 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 199 points. Launch price was $449.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce 320M scores 210 versus the RADEON HD7450's 199 — the GeForce 320M leads by 5.5%. The GeForce 320M is built on Maxwell while the RADEON HD7450 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 320M) vs 1,792 (RADEON HD7450). Raw compute: 0.4216 TFLOPS (GeForce 320M) vs 2.867 TFLOPS (RADEON HD7450). Boost clocks: 549 MHz vs 1250 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 320M | RADEON HD7450 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 210+6% | 199 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 1792+367% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4216 TFLOPS | 2.867 TFLOPS+580% |
| Boost Clock | 549 MHz | 1250 MHz+128% |
| ROPs | 8 | 32+300% |
| TMUs | 24 | 112+367% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 448 KB+133% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+33% | 0.75 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 320M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON HD7450 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 320M | RADEON HD7450 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 320M has 256 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON HD7450 carries 512 MB. RADEON HD7450 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 320M and 128-bit on the RADEON HD7450. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 320M) vs 0.75 MB (RADEON HD7450) — the GeForce 320M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 320M | RADEON HD7450 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+33% | 0.75 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce 320M) vs 11.2 (RADEON HD7450). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 320M | RADEON HD7450 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 11.2+11% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 320M) vs VCE 1.0 (RADEON HD7450). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs UVD 3.1.
| Feature | GeForce 320M | RADEON HD7450 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo VP4 | UVD 3.1 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 320M draws 33W versus the RADEON HD7450's 200W — a 143.3% difference. The GeForce 320M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 320M) vs 350W (RADEON HD7450). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.
| Feature | GeForce 320M | RADEON HD7450 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-84% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | — | 168mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 6.4+540% | 1.0 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce 320M (2015 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce 320M | RADEON HD7450 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $50 |
| Codename | GM108 | Tahiti |
| Release | March 13 2015 | January 31 2012 |
| Ranking | #880 | #454 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














