GeForce 320M vs RADEON HD7450

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 320M is positioned at rank 101 and the RADEON HD7450 is on rank 259, so the GeForce 320M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 320M

#30

Radeon 8050S

MSRP: $400|Avg: $400

97%

#31

Radeon RX 8050S

MSRP: $400|Avg: $400

96%

#91

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

259%

#93

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

234%

#94

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

234%

#98

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

213%

#99

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

211%

#101

GeForce 320M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#103

Radeon RX 460 (móvel)

MSRP: $99|Avg: $45

99%

#105

GeForce GTX 680M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

98%

#106

Radeon HD 7470M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $12

97%

#110

GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

96%

#114

Radeon RX 470 (móvel)

MSRP: $179|Avg: $40

93%

#116

GeForce GTX 880M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

91%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar RADEON HD7450

#1

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

MSRP: $399|Avg: $280

1823%

#2

GeForce RTX 5060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

1751%

#3

Radeon RX 5600 XT

MSRP: $279|Avg: $180

1731%

#4

Radeon RX 9060

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

1728%

#5

GeForce RTX 5050

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

1724%

#6

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

MSRP: $249|Avg: $150

1714%

#7

Arc A580

MSRP: $179|Avg: $179

1693%

#8

Radeon RX 9060 XT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

1686%

#9

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

1671%

#10

Radeon RX 7600

MSRP: $269|Avg: $250

1666%

#11

Radeon RX 6600

MSRP: $329|Avg: $180

1646%

#12

GeForce RTX 4060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

1643%

#13

Arc B570

MSRP: $219|Avg: $219

1613%

#14

Arc B580

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

1612%

#244

Radeon R5 430 OEM

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13

2010%

#259

RADEON HD7450

MSRP: $50|Avg: $15

100%

#260

GeForce GT 330

MSRP: $99|Avg: $30

100%

#262

Radeon HD 7340G

MSRP: $50|Avg: $15

98%

#263

Radeon HD 8210E

MSRP: $50|Avg: $50

97%

#264

Radeon 535DX

MSRP: $200|Avg: $40

97%

#266

GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT

MSRP: $85|Avg: $15

96%

#267

GeForce GT 130

MSRP: $100|Avg: $20

96%

#268

Radeon M535DX

MSRP: $200|Avg: $40

94%

#269

Radeon HD 7310G

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

91%

#270

Radeon HD 7450A

MSRP: $80|Avg: $40

90%

#271

Radeon HD 6450

MSRP: $55|Avg: $55

90%

#273

Radeon HD 3450

MSRP: $50|Avg: $15

90%

#274

Radeon HD 6230

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

90%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce 320M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the RADEON HD7450 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	GeForce 320M	RADEON HD7450
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+5.5%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-5.5%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce 320M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce 320M Benchmark Check

RADEON HD7450 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 320M and RADEON HD7450

GeForce 320M

The GeForce 320M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 549 MHz to 549 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 210 points.

RADEON HD7450

The RADEON HD7450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1250 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 199 points. Launch price was $449.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce 320M scores 210 versus the RADEON HD7450's 199 — the GeForce 320M leads by 5.5%. The GeForce 320M is built on Maxwell while the RADEON HD7450 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 320M) vs 1,792 (RADEON HD7450). Raw compute: 0.4216 TFLOPS (GeForce 320M) vs 2.867 TFLOPS (RADEON HD7450). Boost clocks: 549 MHz vs 1250 MHz.

Feature	GeForce 320M	RADEON HD7450
G3D Mark Score	210+6%	199
Architecture	Maxwell	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	1792+367%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.4216 TFLOPS	2.867 TFLOPS+580%
Boost Clock	549 MHz	1250 MHz+128%
ROPs	8	32+300%
TMUs	24	112+367%
L1 Cache	192 KB	448 KB+133%
L2 Cache	1 MB+33%	0.75 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce 320M	RADEON HD7450
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 320M comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON HD7450 has 512 MB. The RADEON HD7450 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 320M) vs 0.75 MB (RADEON HD7450) — the GeForce 320M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 320M	RADEON HD7450
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	0.5 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+33%	0.75 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce 320M) vs 11.2 (RADEON HD7450). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce 320M	RADEON HD7450
DirectX	10.1	11.2+11%
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 320M) vs VCE 1.0 (RADEON HD7450). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs UVD 3.1.

Feature	GeForce 320M	RADEON HD7450
Encoder	None	VCE 1.0
Decoder	PureVideo VP4	UVD 3.1
Codecs	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 320M draws 33W versus the RADEON HD7450's 200W — a 143.3% difference. The GeForce 320M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 320M) vs 350W (RADEON HD7450). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.