GeForce 320M vs Quadro FX 1700

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 320M vs Quadro FX 1700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 320M vs Quadro FX 1700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 320M

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 33W instead of 189W, a 156W reduction.
✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 1700 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $699 MSRP).

Quadro FX 1700

2008

Why buy it

✅6.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌472.7% higher power demand at 189W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro FX 1700 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 6.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.9% in PassMark G3D (216 vs 210), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 320M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 55nm and a newer 2015 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro FX 1700 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro FX 1700 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce 320M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce 320M vs Quadro FX 1700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 320M

The GeForce 320M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 549 MHz to 549 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 210 points.

Quadro FX 1700

The Quadro FX 1700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 216 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 320M scores 210 and the Quadro FX 1700 reaches 216 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 320M is built on Maxwell while the Quadro FX 1700 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 320M) vs 240 (Quadro FX 1700). Raw compute: 0.4216 TFLOPS (GeForce 320M) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1700).

Feature	GeForce 320M	Quadro FX 1700
G3D Mark Score	210	216+3%
Architecture	Maxwell	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	384+60%	240
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.4216 TFLOPS	0.6221 TFLOPS+48%
ROPs	8	32+300%
TMUs	24	80+233%
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 320M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 1700 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 320M	Quadro FX 1700
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 320M has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 1700 carries 512 MB. Quadro FX 1700 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 320M and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 1700. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 320M) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 1700) — the GeForce 320M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 320M	Quadro FX 1700
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	0.5 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce 320M) vs 10_0 (Quadro FX 1700). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce 320M	Quadro FX 1700
DirectX	10.1	10_0
Max Displays	2	2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 320M draws 33W versus the Quadro FX 1700's 189W — a 140.5% difference. The GeForce 320M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 320M) vs 350W (Quadro FX 1700). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce 320M	Quadro FX 1700
TDP	33W-83%	189W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Length	—	168mm
Height	0mm	—
Slots	1	1
Temp (Load)	80°C	—
Perf/Watt	6.4+482%	1.1

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce 320M (2015 vs 2008).

Feature	GeForce 320M	Quadro FX 1700
MSRP	—	$699
Codename	GM108	GT200B
Release	March 13 2015	November 11 2008
Ranking	#880	#815

Search GeForce 320M on Amazon

Search Quadro FX 1700 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.