GeForce 320M vs Radeon R2E

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 320M vs Radeon R2E FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 320M vs Radeon R2E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 320M

2015

Why buy it

✅17.3% more average FPS across 41 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Draws 33W instead of 55W, a 22W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon R2E

2013

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 320M across 41 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌66.7% higher power demand at 55W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce 320M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 17.3% in average FPS across 41 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R2E instead at 211 vs 210, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 320M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2015 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce 320M makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce 320M vs Radeon R2E Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 320M

The GeForce 320M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 549 MHz to 549 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 210 points.

Radeon R2E

The Radeon R2E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 20 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 211 points. Launch price was $109.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 320M scores 210 and the Radeon R2E reaches 211 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 320M is built on Maxwell while the Radeon R2E uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 320M) vs 512 (Radeon R2E). Raw compute: 0.4216 TFLOPS (GeForce 320M) vs 0.8192 TFLOPS (Radeon R2E).

Feature	GeForce 320M	Radeon R2E
G3D Mark Score	210	211
Architecture	Maxwell	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	512+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.4216 TFLOPS	0.8192 TFLOPS+94%
ROPs	8	16+100%
TMUs	24	32+33%
L1 Cache	192 KB+50%	128 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 320M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R2E leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 320M	Radeon R2E
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 320M has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R2E carries 512 MB. Radeon R2E gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 320M and 64-bit on the Radeon R2E. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 320M) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R2E) — the GeForce 320M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 320M	Radeon R2E
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	0.5 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 320M draws 33W versus the Radeon R2E's 55W — a 50% difference. The GeForce 320M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 320M) vs 350W (Radeon R2E). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce 320M	Radeon R2E
TDP	33W-40%	55W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Height	0mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	80°C	—
Perf/Watt	6.4+68%	3.8

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce 320M (2015 vs 2013).

Feature	GeForce 320M	Radeon R2E
MSRP	—	$0
Codename	GM108	Cape Verde
Release	March 13 2015	December 20 2013
Ranking	#880	#738

Search GeForce 320M on Amazon

Search Radeon R2E on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.