GeForce GT 240M vs Radeon HD 4650 AGP

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 240M is positioned at rank 392 and the Radeon HD 4650 AGP is on rank 607, so the GeForce GT 240M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 240M

#382

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

1280%

#384

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

1161%

#385

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

1158%

#389

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

1053%

#390

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

1045%

#392

GeForce GT 240M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#393

Radeon R9 M485X

MSRP: $450|Avg: $150

100%

#394

Radeon HD 8570D + HD 6670 Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $100

99%

#395

Radeon HD 6650A

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

99%

#396

GeForce 920A

MSRP: $100|Avg: $15

98%

#397

GeForce 930A

MSRP: $150|Avg: $20

98%

#398

Mobility Radeon HD 4650

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

96%

#400

Radeon R9 M290X

MSRP: $400|Avg: $60

95%

#401

Radeon HD 7670

MSRP: $100|Avg: $25

95%

#402

Radeon HD 8550G + 8750M Dual

MSRP: $100|Avg: $100

94%

#403

Mobility Radeon HD 5000

MSRP: $99|Avg: $20

92%

#404

Iris Pro Graphics 5200

MSRP: $150|Avg: $40

92%

#406

Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C

MSRP: $150|Avg: $50

92%

#407

Radeon HD 8650G + 7700M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $30

89%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 4650 AGP

#597

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

4176%

#599

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

3785%

#600

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

3775%

#604

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

3433%

#605

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

3410%

#607

Radeon HD 4650 AGP

MSRP: $80|Avg: $20

100%

#608

GeForce 9800M GS

MSRP: $200|Avg: $50

100%

#609

Radeon R7 M270

MSRP: $300|Avg: $300

99%

#610

GeForce 9800 GTX

MSRP: $299|Avg: $30

99%

#611

Mobility Radeon HD 5850

MSRP: $299|Avg: $30

98%

#612

Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400

MSRP: $49|Avg: $10

98%

#614

GeForce 205

MSRP: $50|Avg: $15

97%

#615

GeForce 9600 GSO

MSRP: $129|Avg: $25

96%

#616

GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+

MSRP: $229|Avg: $40

96%

#617

GeForce 9400

MSRP: $59|Avg: $15

96%

#618

GeForce 7350 LE

MSRP: $30|Avg: $10

95%

#620

Mobility Radeon HD 3850

MSRP: $150|Avg: $15

94%

#621

Mobility Radeon HD 4870

MSRP: $299|Avg: $20

93%

#622

GeForce 9800M GT

MSRP: $160|Avg: $5

92%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GT 240M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.9% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 4650 AGP.

Insight	GeForce GT 240M	Radeon HD 4650 AGP
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+1.9%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.9%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GT 240M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GT 240M Benchmark Check

Radeon HD 4650 AGP Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 240M and Radeon HD 4650 AGP

GeForce GT 240M

The GeForce GT 240M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from Up to 625 MHz to 645 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 32W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 212 points.

Radeon HD 4650 AGP

The Radeon HD 4650 AGP is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 19 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 208 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 240M scores 212 and the Radeon HD 4650 AGP reaches 208 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 240M is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 4650 AGP uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 240M) vs 480 (Radeon HD 4650 AGP). Raw compute: 0.48 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 240M) vs 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4650 AGP).

Feature	GeForce GT 240M	Radeon HD 4650 AGP
G3D Mark Score	212+2%	208
Architecture	Kepler	TeraScale 2
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	384	480+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.48 TFLOPS	0.576 TFLOPS+20%
ROPs	16+100%	8
TMUs	32+33%	24
L1 Cache	32 KB	48 KB+50%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GT 240M	Radeon HD 4650 AGP
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 240M comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 4650 AGP has 512 MB. The GeForce GT 240M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	GeForce GT 240M	Radeon HD 4650 AGP
VRAM Capacity	1 GB+100%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (10_1) (GeForce GT 240M) vs 10.1 (Radeon HD 4650 AGP). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce GT 240M	Radeon HD 4650 AGP
DirectX	11.1 (10_1)+10%	10.1
Max Displays	0	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce GT 240M) vs UVD 2 (Radeon HD 4650 AGP). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP4) vs UVD 2.

Feature	GeForce GT 240M	Radeon HD 4650 AGP
Encoder	None	UVD 2
Decoder	PureVideo HD (VP4)	UVD 2
Codecs	MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 240M draws 32W versus the Radeon HD 4650 AGP's 45W — a 33.8% difference. The GeForce GT 240M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 240M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 4650 AGP). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 193mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.