GeForce GT 220 vs GeForce GT 240M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 220 vs GeForce GT 240M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 220 vs GeForce GT 240M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 220

2008

Why buy it

✅27.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($69 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌637.5% higher power demand at 236W vs 32W.

GeForce GT 240M

2012

Why buy it

✅Draws 32W instead of 236W, a 204W reduction.
✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GT 220 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2012 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 3.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $69 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GT 220 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 27.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 4.7% in PassMark G3D (222 vs 212), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GT 220 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GT 220 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce GT 220 vs GeForce GT 240M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 220

The GeForce GT 220 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 16 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 236W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 222 points. Launch price was $649.

GeForce GT 240M

The GeForce GT 240M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from Up to 625 MHz to 645 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 32W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 212 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 220 scores 222 and the GeForce GT 240M reaches 212 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 220 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the GeForce GT 240M uses Kepler, both on 65 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 240 (GeForce GT 220) vs 384 (GeForce GT 240M). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 220) vs 0.48 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 240M).

Feature	GeForce GT 220	GeForce GT 240M
G3D Mark Score	222+5%	212
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	Kepler
Process Node	65 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	240	384+60%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6221 TFLOPS+30%	0.48 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	80+150%	32
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GT 220	GeForce GT 240M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 1 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 220 and 128-bit on the GeForce GT 240M.

Feature	GeForce GT 220	GeForce GT 240M
VRAM Capacity	1 GB	1 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce GT 220) vs 11.1 (10_1) (GeForce GT 240M). Vulkan: None vs N/A. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce GT 220	GeForce GT 240M
DirectX	10.1	11.1 (10_1)+10%
Vulkan	None	N/A
OpenGL	3.3	3.3
Max Displays	3	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce GT 220) vs None (GeForce GT 240M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs PureVideo HD (VP4). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 220) vs MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4 (GeForce GT 240M).

Feature	GeForce GT 220	GeForce GT 240M
Encoder	No	None
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP4	PureVideo HD (VP4)
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP	MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 220 draws 236W versus the GeForce GT 240M's 32W — a 152.2% difference. The GeForce GT 240M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 220) vs 350W (GeForce GT 240M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 70.

Feature	GeForce GT 220	GeForce GT 240M
TDP	236W	32W-86%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	168mm	0mm
Height	111mm	0mm
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	65°C-7%	70
Perf/Watt	0.9	6.6+633%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GT 240M (2012 vs 2008).

Feature	GeForce GT 220	GeForce GT 240M
MSRP	$69	—
Codename	GT200	GK107
Release	June 16 2008	March 22 2012
Ranking	#802	#909

Search GeForce GT 220 on Amazon

Search GeForce GT 240M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.