Radeon HD 4670 vs GeForce GT 620
Radeon HD 4670
Popular choices:
GeForce GT 620
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 4670 is positioned at rank 208 and the GeForce GT 620 is on rank 190, so the GeForce GT 620 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 4670
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 620
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GT 620 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon HD 4670 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon HD 4670 | GeForce GT 620 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GT 620 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GT 620 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $67), it costs 70% less, resulting in a 240.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 4670 | GeForce GT 620 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+240.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($67) | ✅More affordable ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 4670 and GeForce GT 620
Radeon HD 4670
The Radeon HD 4670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 382 points. Launch price was $369.
GeForce GT 620
The GeForce GT 620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 5 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 902 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 388 points. Launch price was $99.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 4670 scores 382 and the GeForce GT 620 reaches 388 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 4670 is built on TeraScale 3 while the GeForce GT 620 uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Radeon HD 4670) vs 384 (GeForce GT 620). Raw compute: 2.703 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4670) vs 0.6927 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 620).
| Feature | Radeon HD 4670 | GeForce GT 620 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 382 | 388+2% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+300% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.703 TFLOPS+290% | 0.6927 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 96+200% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB+500% | 32 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 4670 | GeForce GT 620 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 4670 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 620 has 512 MB. The Radeon HD 4670 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon HD 4670) vs 256 KB (GeForce GT 620) — the Radeon HD 4670 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 4670 | GeForce GT 620 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (Radeon HD 4670) vs 11.0 (GeForce GT 620). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.2. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon HD 4670 | GeForce GT 620 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 11.0+9% |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.2+27% |
| Max Displays | 3 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Decoder: UVD 2.2 vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,DivX (Radeon HD 4670) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 620).
| Feature | Radeon HD 4670 | GeForce GT 620 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | — | No |
| Decoder | UVD 2.2 | PureVideo HD VP5 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,DivX | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 4670 draws 250W versus the GeForce GT 620's 65W — a 117.5% difference. The GeForce GT 620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon HD 4670) vs 250W (GeForce GT 620). Power connectors: None vs None. Card length: 193mm vs 145mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | Radeon HD 4670 | GeForce GT 620 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 65W-74% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W | 250W-17% |
| Power Connector | None | None |
| Length | 193mm | 145mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-7% | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 1.5 | 6.0+300% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 4670 launched at $67 MSRP and currently averages $67, while the GeForce GT 620 launched at $59 and now averages $20. The GeForce GT 620 costs 70.1% less ($47 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 5.7 (Radeon HD 4670) vs 19.4 (GeForce GT 620) — the GeForce GT 620 offers 240.4% better value. The GeForce GT 620 is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2010).
| Feature | Radeon HD 4670 | GeForce GT 620 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $67 | $59-12% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $67 | $20-70% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.7 | 19.4+240% |
| Codename | Cayman | GK107 |
| Release | December 14 2010 | June 5 2012 |
| Ranking | #596 | #837 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 4670 and GeForce GT 620
