Radeon HD 4670 vs Radeon HD 8650D

AMD

Radeon HD 4670

2010Boost: 880 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 8650D

2012Boost: 1000 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon HD 4670 vs Radeon HD 8650D Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 4670 vs Radeon HD 8650D FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 4670 vs Radeon HD 8650D: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 4670

2010

Why buy it

  • 2.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $83 less on MSRP ($67 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • Delivers 116% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.7 vs 2.6 G3D/$ ($67 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • 2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 92.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 130W.

Radeon HD 8650D

2012

Why buy it

  • Draws 130W instead of 250W, a 120W reduction.
  • More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 4670 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 123.9% HIGHER MSRP
    $150 MSRPvs$67 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.6 vs 5.7 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $67 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 4670 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 2.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon HD 8650D instead at 396 vs 382, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon HD 4670 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 4670 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $83 cheaper on MSRP at $67 vs $150, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 116% (5.7 vs 2.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Radeon HD 4670 vs Radeon HD 8650D Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon HD 4670

The Radeon HD 4670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 382 points. Launch price was $369.

AMD

Radeon HD 8650D

The Radeon HD 8650D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 5 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 396 points. Launch price was $249.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 4670 scores 382 and the Radeon HD 8650D reaches 396 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 4670 is built on TeraScale 3 while the Radeon HD 8650D uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Radeon HD 4670) vs 1,024 (Radeon HD 8650D). Raw compute: 2.703 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4670) vs 1.761 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8650D). Boost clocks: 880 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

FeatureRadeon HD 4670Radeon HD 8650D
G3D Mark Score
382
396+4%
Architecture
TeraScale 3
GCN 1.0
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1536+50%
1024
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.703 TFLOPS+53%
1.761 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
880 MHz
1000 MHz+14%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
96+50%
64
L1 Cache
192 KB
256 KB+33%
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 4670Radeon HD 8650D
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 4670 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8650D carries 512 MB. Radeon HD 4670 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 4670 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 8650D.

FeatureRadeon HD 4670Radeon HD 8650D
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 4670 draws 250W versus the Radeon HD 8650D's 130W — a 63.2% difference. The Radeon HD 8650D is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon HD 4670) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8650D). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureRadeon HD 4670Radeon HD 8650D
TDP
250W
130W-48%
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
1x 6-pin
Length
193mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
65°C
Perf/Watt
1.5
3.0+100%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon HD 4670 came in at $67, while the Radeon HD 8650D launched at $150. On MSRP, Radeon HD 4670 was 55.3% cheaper ($83 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.7 (Radeon HD 4670) vs 2.6 (Radeon HD 8650D) — the Radeon HD 4670 offers 119.2% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 8650D (2012 vs 2010).

FeatureRadeon HD 4670Radeon HD 8650D
MSRP
$67-55%
$150
Performance per Dollar
5.7+119%
2.6
Codename
Cayman
Pitcairn
Release
December 14 2010
March 5 2012
Ranking
#596
#503

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.