GeForce GT 620 vs Radeon HD 4670

CPU

GPU

GeForce GT 620

2012Core: 902 MHz

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Radeon HD 4670

2010Boost: 880 MHz

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

GeForce GT 620 vs Radeon HD 4670 Performance Spectrum

GeForce GT 620

0.5 GB 65

388

+1.6%

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

Radeon HD 4670

1 GB 250

382

0.0%

Radeon HD 8250

Radeon HD 6370D

Radeon HD 2900 GT

Radeon HD 8570D + HD 8470 Dual

Radeon R9 M395X

Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X

Radeon RX 7600M XT

Radeon RX 6700 XT

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 620 vs Radeon HD 4670 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 620 vs Radeon HD 4670: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 620

2012

Why buy it

✅Costs $8 less on MSRP ($59 MSRP vs $67 MSRP).
✅Delivers 15.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.6 vs 5.7 G3D/$ ($59 MSRP vs $67 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 250W, a 185W reduction.
✅Measures 145mm instead of 193mm, a 48mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 4670 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon HD 4670

2010

Why buy it

✅56.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
13.6% HIGHER MSRP
$67 MSRPvs$59 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.7 vs 6.6 G3D/$ ($67 MSRP vs $59 MSRP).
❌284.6% higher power demand at 250W vs 65W.
❌33.1% longer card at 193mm vs 145mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 4670 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 56.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GT 620 instead at 388 vs 382, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GT 620 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2012 generation instead of 2010. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GT 620 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $8 cheaper on MSRP at $59 vs $67, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 15.3% (6.6 vs 5.7), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon HD 4670 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GT 620 vs Radeon HD 4670 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 620

The GeForce GT 620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 5 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 902 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 388 points. Launch price was $99.

Radeon HD 4670

The Radeon HD 4670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 382 points. Launch price was $369.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 620 scores 388 and the Radeon HD 4670 reaches 382 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 620 is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 4670 uses TeraScale 3, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 620) vs 1,536 (Radeon HD 4670). Raw compute: 0.6927 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 620) vs 2.703 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4670).

Feature	GeForce GT 620	Radeon HD 4670
G3D Mark Score	388+2%	382
Architecture	Kepler	TeraScale 3
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	384	1536+300%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6927 TFLOPS	2.703 TFLOPS+290%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	32	96+200%
L1 Cache	32 KB	192 KB+500%
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 620 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 4670 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GT 620	Radeon HD 4670
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 620 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 4670 carries 1 GB. Radeon HD 4670 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 620 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 4670. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GT 620) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 4670) — the Radeon HD 4670 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GT 620	Radeon HD 4670
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	1 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce GT 620) vs 10.1 (Radeon HD 4670). OpenGL: 4.2 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.

Feature	GeForce GT 620	Radeon HD 4670
DirectX	11.0+9%	10.1
OpenGL	4.2+27%	3.3
Max Displays	3	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs UVD 2.2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 620) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,DivX (Radeon HD 4670).

Feature	GeForce GT 620	Radeon HD 4670
Encoder	No	—
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP5	UVD 2.2
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,DivX

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 620 draws 65W versus the Radeon HD 4670's 250W — a 117.5% difference. The GeForce GT 620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 250W (GeForce GT 620) vs 300W (Radeon HD 4670). Power connectors: None vs None. Card length: 145mm vs 193mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 65°C.

Feature	GeForce GT 620	Radeon HD 4670
TDP	65W-74%	250W
Recommended PSU	250W-17%	300W
Power Connector	None	None
Length	145mm	193mm
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	1
Temp (Load)	70°C	65°C-7%
Perf/Watt	6.0+300%	1.5

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 620 came in at $59, while the Radeon HD 4670 launched at $67. On MSRP, GeForce GT 620 was 11.9% cheaper ($8 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.6 (GeForce GT 620) vs 5.7 (Radeon HD 4670) — the GeForce GT 620 offers 15.8% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GT 620 (2012 vs 2010).

Feature	GeForce GT 620	Radeon HD 4670
MSRP	$59-12%	$67
Performance per Dollar	6.6+16%	5.7
Codename	GK107	Cayman
Release	June 5 2012	December 14 2010
Ranking	#837	#596

Search GeForce GT 620 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 4670 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.