GeForce GT 620 vs RADEON E4690

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 620 vs RADEON E4690 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 620 vs RADEON E4690: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 620

2012

Why buy it

✅Costs $499 less on MSRP ($59 MSRP vs $558 MSRP).
✅Delivers 806.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.6 vs 0.7 G3D/$ ($59 MSRP vs $558 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RADEON E4690 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

RADEON E4690

2015

Why buy it

✅57.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅More future proof: GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
845.8% HIGHER MSRP
$558 MSRPvs$59 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.7 vs 6.6 G3D/$ ($558 MSRP vs $59 MSRP).
❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RADEON E4690 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 57.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 4.4% in PassMark G3D (405 vs 388), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GT 620 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GT 620 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $499 cheaper on MSRP at $59 vs $558, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 806.1% (6.6 vs 0.7), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. RADEON E4690 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GT 620 vs RADEON E4690 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 620

The GeForce GT 620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 5 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 902 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 388 points. Launch price was $99.

RADEON E4690

The RADEON E4690 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 29 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 405 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 620 scores 388 and the RADEON E4690 reaches 405 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 620 is built on Kepler while the RADEON E4690 uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 620) vs 2,048 (RADEON E4690). Raw compute: 0.6927 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 620) vs 4.096 TFLOPS (RADEON E4690).

Feature	GeForce GT 620	RADEON E4690
G3D Mark Score	388	405+4%
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 3.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	2048+433%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6927 TFLOPS	4.096 TFLOPS+491%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	32	128+300%
L1 Cache	32 KB	512 KB+1500%
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 620 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON E4690 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GT 620	RADEON E4690
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 620 and 64-bit on the RADEON E4690. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GT 620) vs 512 KB (RADEON E4690) — the RADEON E4690 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GT 620	RADEON E4690
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 620 draws 65W versus the RADEON E4690's 95W — a 37.5% difference. The GeForce GT 620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 250W (GeForce GT 620) vs 350W (RADEON E4690). Power connectors: None vs Legacy.

Feature	GeForce GT 620	RADEON E4690
TDP	65W-32%	95W
Recommended PSU	250W-29%	350W
Power Connector	None	Legacy
Length	145mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	6.0+40%	4.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 620 came in at $59, while the RADEON E4690 launched at $558. On MSRP, GeForce GT 620 was 89.4% cheaper ($499 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.6 (GeForce GT 620) vs 0.7 (RADEON E4690) — the GeForce GT 620 offers 842.9% better value. The newer card here is RADEON E4690 (2015 vs 2012).

Feature	GeForce GT 620	RADEON E4690
MSRP	$59-89%	$558
Performance per Dollar	6.6+843%	0.7
Codename	GK107	Amethyst
Release	June 5 2012	September 29 2015
Ranking	#837	#420

Search GeForce GT 620 on Amazon

Search RADEON E4690 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.