GeForce GT 620 vs Mobility Radeon HD 4650

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 620

2012Core: 902 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 4650

2010Core: 700 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GT 620 vs Mobility Radeon HD 4650 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 620 vs Mobility Radeon HD 4650: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 620

2012

Why buy it

  • More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 20.4% HIGHER MSRP
    $59 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.6 vs 8.2 G3D/$ ($59 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
  • 30% higher power demand at 65W vs 50W.

Mobility Radeon HD 4650

2010

Why buy it

  • Costs $10 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $59 MSRP).
  • Delivers 24.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.2 vs 6.6 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $59 MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Draws 50W instead of 65W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Mobility Radeon HD 4650 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3.4% in PassMark G3D (401 vs 388), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GT 620 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2012 generation instead of 2010. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Mobility Radeon HD 4650 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $10 cheaper on MSRP at $49 vs $59, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 24.4% (8.2 vs 6.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Mobility Radeon HD 4650 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GT 620 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GT 620 vs Mobility Radeon HD 4650 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 620

The GeForce GT 620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 5 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 902 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 388 points. Launch price was $99.

AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 4650

The Mobility Radeon HD 4650 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 401 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 620 scores 388 and the Mobility Radeon HD 4650 reaches 401 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 620 is built on Kepler while the Mobility Radeon HD 4650 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 620) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 4650). Raw compute: 0.6927 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 620) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 4650).

FeatureGeForce GT 620Mobility Radeon HD 4650
G3D Mark Score
388
401+3%
Architecture
Kepler
TeraScale 2
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
384
800+108%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6927 TFLOPS
1.12 TFLOPS+62%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
32
40+25%
L1 Cache
32 KB
80 KB+150%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 620 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Mobility Radeon HD 4650 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GT 620Mobility Radeon HD 4650
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 620 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Mobility Radeon HD 4650 carries 1 GB. Mobility Radeon HD 4650 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 620 and 128-bit on the Mobility Radeon HD 4650.

FeatureGeForce GT 620Mobility Radeon HD 4650
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
1 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce GT 620) vs 10.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 4650). Vulkan: None vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.2 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce GT 620Mobility Radeon HD 4650
DirectX
11.0+9%
10.1
Vulkan
None
N/A
OpenGL
4.2+27%
3.3
Max Displays
3+50%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce GT 620) vs None (Mobility Radeon HD 4650). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs UVD 2.2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 620) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Mobility Radeon HD 4650).

FeatureGeForce GT 620Mobility Radeon HD 4650
Encoder
No
None
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP5
UVD 2.2
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 620 draws 65W versus the Mobility Radeon HD 4650's 50W — a 26.1% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 4650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 250W (GeForce GT 620) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 4650). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 145mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80.

FeatureGeForce GT 620Mobility Radeon HD 4650
TDP
65W
50W-23%
Recommended PSU
250W-29%
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
145mm
0mm
Height
111mm
0mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
70°C-13%
80
Perf/Watt
6.0
8.0+33%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 620 came in at $59, while the Mobility Radeon HD 4650 launched at $49. On MSRP, Mobility Radeon HD 4650 was 16.9% cheaper ($10 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.6 (GeForce GT 620) vs 8.2 (Mobility Radeon HD 4650) — the Mobility Radeon HD 4650 offers 24.2% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GT 620 (2012 vs 2010).

FeatureGeForce GT 620Mobility Radeon HD 4650
MSRP
$59
$49-17%
Performance per Dollar
6.6
8.2+24%
Codename
GK107
Broadway
Release
June 5 2012
January 7 2010
Ranking
#837
#846

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.