GeForce GT 620 vs Radeon HD 8650D

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 620

2012Core: 902 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 8650D

2012Boost: 1000 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GT 620 vs Radeon HD 8650D Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 620 vs Radeon HD 8650D FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 620 vs Radeon HD 8650D: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 620

2012

Why buy it

  • Costs $91 less on MSRP ($59 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • Delivers 149.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.6 vs 2.6 G3D/$ ($59 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • Draws 65W instead of 130W, a 65W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 8650D across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon HD 8650D

2012

Why buy it

  • 53.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • 2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 154.2% HIGHER MSRP
    $150 MSRPvs$59 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.6 vs 6.6 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $59 MSRP).
  • 100% higher power demand at 130W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 8650D is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 53.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.1% in PassMark G3D (396 vs 388), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GT 620 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 620 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $91 cheaper on MSRP at $59 vs $150, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 149.1% (6.6 vs 2.6), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon HD 8650D still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GT 620 vs Radeon HD 8650D Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 620

The GeForce GT 620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 5 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 902 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 388 points. Launch price was $99.

AMD

Radeon HD 8650D

The Radeon HD 8650D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 5 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 396 points. Launch price was $249.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 620 scores 388 and the Radeon HD 8650D reaches 396 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 620 is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 8650D uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 620) vs 1,024 (Radeon HD 8650D). Raw compute: 0.6927 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 620) vs 1.761 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8650D).

FeatureGeForce GT 620Radeon HD 8650D
G3D Mark Score
388
396+2%
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
1024+167%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6927 TFLOPS
1.761 TFLOPS+154%
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
32
64+100%
L1 Cache
32 KB
256 KB+700%
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 620 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 8650D leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GT 620Radeon HD 8650D
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 620 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 8650D. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GT 620) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 8650D) — the Radeon HD 8650D has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GT 620Radeon HD 8650D
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 620 draws 65W versus the Radeon HD 8650D's 130W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce GT 620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 250W (GeForce GT 620) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8650D). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureGeForce GT 620Radeon HD 8650D
TDP
65W-50%
130W
Recommended PSU
250W-29%
350W
Power Connector
None
1x 6-pin
Length
145mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
70°C
Perf/Watt
6.0+100%
3.0
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 620 came in at $59, while the Radeon HD 8650D launched at $150. On MSRP, GeForce GT 620 was 60.7% cheaper ($91 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.6 (GeForce GT 620) vs 2.6 (Radeon HD 8650D) — the GeForce GT 620 offers 153.8% better value.

FeatureGeForce GT 620Radeon HD 8650D
MSRP
$59-61%
$150
Performance per Dollar
6.6+154%
2.6
Codename
GK107
Pitcairn
Release
June 5 2012
March 5 2012
Ranking
#837
#503

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.