GeForce GT 620 vs Quadro FX 4600
GeForce GT 620
Popular choices:
Quadro FX 4600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 620 is positioned at rank 190 and the Quadro FX 4600 is on rank 404, so the GeForce GT 620 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 620
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 4600
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro FX 4600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.9% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (768 MB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GT 620.
| Insight | GeForce GT 620 | Quadro FX 4600 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GT 620 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GT 620 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $50), it costs 60% less, resulting in a 140.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GT 620 | Quadro FX 4600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+140.7%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($20) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 620 and Quadro FX 4600
GeForce GT 620
The GeForce GT 620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 5 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 902 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 388 points. Launch price was $99.
Quadro FX 4600
The Quadro FX 4600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 403 points. Launch price was $1,799.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 620 scores 388 and the Quadro FX 4600 reaches 403 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 620 is built on Kepler while the Quadro FX 4600 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 620) vs 192 (Quadro FX 4600). Raw compute: 0.6927 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 620) vs 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 4600).
| Feature | GeForce GT 620 | Quadro FX 4600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 388 | 403+4% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+100% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6927 TFLOPS+50% | 0.4623 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 24+50% |
| TMUs | 32 | 64+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB+33% | 192 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GT 620 | Quadro FX 4600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 620 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 4600 has 768 MB. The Quadro FX 4600 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GT 620) vs 192 KB (Quadro FX 4600) — the GeForce GT 620 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GT 620 | Quadro FX 4600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.75 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB+33% | 192 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 620 draws 65W versus the Quadro FX 4600's 150W — a 79.1% difference. The GeForce GT 620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 250W (GeForce GT 620) vs 350W (Quadro FX 4600). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GT 620 | Quadro FX 4600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 65W-57% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 250W-29% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 145mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 6.0+122% | 2.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GT 620 launched at $59 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the Quadro FX 4600 launched at $1999 and now averages $50. The GeForce GT 620 costs 60% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 19.4 (GeForce GT 620) vs 8.1 (Quadro FX 4600) — the GeForce GT 620 offers 139.5% better value. The GeForce GT 620 is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce GT 620 | Quadro FX 4600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $59-97% | $1999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20-60% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 19.4+140% | 8.1 |
| Codename | GK107 | GT200B |
| Release | June 5 2012 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #837 | #884 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GT 620 and Quadro FX 4600
