GeForce GTS 350M vs Radeon HD 4670

NVIDIA

GeForce GTS 350M

2010Core: 783 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 4670

2010Boost: 880 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTS 350M vs Radeon HD 4670 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTS 350M vs Radeon HD 4670 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTS 350M vs Radeon HD 4670: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTS 350M

2010

Why buy it

  • Draws 106W instead of 250W, a 144W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 4670 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $67 MSRP).

Radeon HD 4670

2010

Why buy it

  • 37.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($67 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 135.8% higher power demand at 250W vs 106W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 4670 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 37.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.3% in PassMark G3D (382 vs 381), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTS 350M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 4670 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 4670 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTS 350M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTS 350M vs Radeon HD 4670 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTS 350M

The GeForce GTS 350M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 783 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 106W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 381 points. Launch price was $129.

AMD

Radeon HD 4670

The Radeon HD 4670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 382 points. Launch price was $369.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTS 350M scores 381 and the Radeon HD 4670 reaches 382 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTS 350M is built on Fermi while the Radeon HD 4670 uses TeraScale 3, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 192 (GeForce GTS 350M) vs 1,536 (Radeon HD 4670). Raw compute: 0.6013 TFLOPS (GeForce GTS 350M) vs 2.703 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4670).

FeatureGeForce GTS 350MRadeon HD 4670
G3D Mark Score
381
382
Architecture
Fermi
TeraScale 3
Process Node
40 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
192
1536+700%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6013 TFLOPS
2.703 TFLOPS+350%
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
32
96+200%
L1 Cache
256 KB+33%
192 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTS 350M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 4670 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTS 350MRadeon HD 4670
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 1 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTS 350M and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 4670. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GTS 350M) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 4670) — the Radeon HD 4670 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTS 350MRadeon HD 4670
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
1 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (10_1) (GeForce GTS 350M) vs 10.1 (Radeon HD 4670). OpenGL: 2.1 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.

FeatureGeForce GTS 350MRadeon HD 4670
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)+10%
10.1
OpenGL
2.1
3.3+57%
Max Displays
2
3+50%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs UVD 2.2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTS 350M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,DivX (Radeon HD 4670).

FeatureGeForce GTS 350MRadeon HD 4670
Encoder
PureVideo HD VP4
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP4
UVD 2.2
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,DivX
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTS 350M draws 106W versus the Radeon HD 4670's 250W — a 80.9% difference. The GeForce GTS 350M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTS 350M) vs 300W (Radeon HD 4670). Power connectors: Legacy vs None. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 65°C.

FeatureGeForce GTS 350MRadeon HD 4670
TDP
106W-58%
250W
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
Legacy
None
Length
193mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
85°C
65°C-24%
Perf/Watt
3.6+140%
1.5