
GeForce GTS 350M

Radeon HD 4670
GeForce GTS 350M vs Radeon HD 4670 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTS 350M vs Radeon HD 4670 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTS 350M vs Radeon HD 4670: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTS 350M
2010Why buy it
- ✅Draws 106W instead of 250W, a 144W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 4670 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $67 MSRP).
Radeon HD 4670
2010Why buy it
- ✅37.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($67 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌135.8% higher power demand at 250W vs 106W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTS 350M vs Radeon HD 4670 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTS 350M
The GeForce GTS 350M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 783 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 106W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 381 points. Launch price was $129.

Radeon HD 4670
The Radeon HD 4670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 382 points. Launch price was $369.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTS 350M scores 381 and the Radeon HD 4670 reaches 382 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTS 350M is built on Fermi while the Radeon HD 4670 uses TeraScale 3, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 192 (GeForce GTS 350M) vs 1,536 (Radeon HD 4670). Raw compute: 0.6013 TFLOPS (GeForce GTS 350M) vs 2.703 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4670).
| Feature | GeForce GTS 350M | Radeon HD 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 381 | 382 |
| Architecture | Fermi | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 1536+700% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6013 TFLOPS | 2.703 TFLOPS+350% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 96+200% |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB+33% | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTS 350M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 4670 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 350M | Radeon HD 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 1 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTS 350M and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 4670. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GTS 350M) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 4670) — the Radeon HD 4670 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 350M | Radeon HD 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (10_1) (GeForce GTS 350M) vs 10.1 (Radeon HD 4670). OpenGL: 2.1 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 350M | Radeon HD 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_1)+10% | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 3.3+57% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 3+50% |
Media & Encoding
Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs UVD 2.2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTS 350M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,DivX (Radeon HD 4670).
| Feature | GeForce GTS 350M | Radeon HD 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | — |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | UVD 2.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,DivX |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTS 350M draws 106W versus the Radeon HD 4670's 250W — a 80.9% difference. The GeForce GTS 350M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTS 350M) vs 300W (Radeon HD 4670). Power connectors: Legacy vs None. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 350M | Radeon HD 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 106W-58% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | Legacy | None |
| Length | — | 193mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 65°C-24% |
| Perf/Watt | 3.6+140% | 1.5 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













