
GeForce GT 620

GeForce GTS 350M
GeForce GT 620 vs GeForce GTS 350M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GT 620 vs GeForce GTS 350M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GT 620 vs GeForce GTS 350M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GT 620
2012Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($59 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 106W, a 41W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTS 350M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
GeForce GTS 350M
2010Why buy it
- ✅14.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $59 MSRP).
- ❌63.1% higher power demand at 106W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 620 vs GeForce GTS 350M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 620
The GeForce GT 620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 5 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 902 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 388 points. Launch price was $99.

GeForce GTS 350M
The GeForce GTS 350M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 783 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 106W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 381 points. Launch price was $129.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 620 scores 388 and the GeForce GTS 350M reaches 381 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 620 is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTS 350M uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 620) vs 192 (GeForce GTS 350M). Raw compute: 0.6927 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 620) vs 0.6013 TFLOPS (GeForce GTS 350M).
| Feature | GeForce GT 620 | GeForce GTS 350M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 388+2% | 381 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+100% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6927 TFLOPS+15% | 0.6013 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 256 KB+700% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GT 620 | GeForce GTS 350M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 620 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTS 350M carries 1 GB. GeForce GTS 350M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 620 and 128-bit on the GeForce GTS 350M.
| Feature | GeForce GT 620 | GeForce GTS 350M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce GT 620) vs 11.1 (10_1) (GeForce GTS 350M). OpenGL: 4.2 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce GT 620 | GeForce GTS 350M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0 | 11.1 (10_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.2+100% | 2.1 |
| Max Displays | 3+50% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce GT 620) vs PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTS 350M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 620) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTS 350M).
| Feature | GeForce GT 620 | GeForce GTS 350M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP5 | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 620 draws 65W versus the GeForce GTS 350M's 106W — a 48% difference. The GeForce GT 620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 250W (GeForce GT 620) vs 350W (GeForce GTS 350M). Power connectors: None vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GT 620 | GeForce GTS 350M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 65W-39% | 106W |
| Recommended PSU | 250W-29% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | Legacy |
| Length | 145mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-18% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 6.0+67% | 3.6 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce GT 620 (2012 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GT 620 | GeForce GTS 350M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $59 | — |
| Codename | GK107 | GF106 |
| Release | June 5 2012 | September 13 2010 |
| Ranking | #837 | #791 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














