GeForce GTS 350M vs Quadro FX 1800

NVIDIA

GeForce GTS 350M

2010Core: 783 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro FX 1800

2008Core: 610 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTS 350M vs Quadro FX 1800 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTS 350M vs Quadro FX 1800 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTS 350M vs Quadro FX 1800: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTS 350M

2010

Why buy it

  • 33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 768 MB).
  • Draws 106W instead of 189W, a 83W reduction.
  • More future proof: Fermi (2010−2014) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 1800 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $489 MSRP).

Quadro FX 1800

2008

Why buy it

  • 23.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($489 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 768 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2008 hardware with 768 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 78.3% higher power demand at 189W vs 106W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro FX 1800 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 23.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3.7% in PassMark G3D (395 vs 381), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTS 350M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 768 MB of VRAM, a 40nm process instead of 55nm, and a newer 2010 generation instead of 2008. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro FX 1800 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro FX 1800 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTS 350M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTS 350M vs Quadro FX 1800 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTS 350M

The GeForce GTS 350M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 783 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 106W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 381 points. Launch price was $129.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 1800

The Quadro FX 1800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 395 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTS 350M scores 381 and the Quadro FX 1800 reaches 395 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTS 350M is built on Fermi while the Quadro FX 1800 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 192 (GeForce GTS 350M) vs 240 (Quadro FX 1800). Raw compute: 0.6013 TFLOPS (GeForce GTS 350M) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1800).

FeatureGeForce GTS 350MQuadro FX 1800
G3D Mark Score
381
395+4%
Architecture
Fermi
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
40 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
192
240+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6013 TFLOPS
0.6221 TFLOPS+3%
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
32
80+150%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTS 350M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 1800 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTS 350MQuadro FX 1800
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTS 350M has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 1800 carries 768 MB. GeForce GTS 350M gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTS 350M and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 1800.

FeatureGeForce GTS 350MQuadro FX 1800
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+33%
0.75 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTS 350M draws 106W versus the Quadro FX 1800's 189W — a 56.3% difference. The GeForce GTS 350M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTS 350M) vs 350W (Quadro FX 1800). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GTS 350MQuadro FX 1800
TDP
106W-44%
189W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
3.6+71%
2.1
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GTS 350M (2010 vs 2008).

FeatureGeForce GTS 350MQuadro FX 1800
MSRP
$489
Codename
GF106
GT200B
Release
September 13 2010
November 11 2008
Ranking
#791
#815

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.